NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3

Training Session for Policy Implementation

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3, Hello! My name is Hypo. Today I am here to present guidelines for a training session. I will describe the policy implementation at Mercy Medical Center. I will discuss various training strategies for medical staff to prevent diabetes. Additionally, I will shed light on the importance of stakeholders in healthcare centers. I will also discuss stakeholders’ involvement and engagement in implementing change in healthcare organizations.

Policy on Managing Diabetes

Mercy Medical Center can potentially benefit from implementing the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines, the Chronic Care Model (CCM), and the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) as policies to prevent and manage diabetes. These policies effectively improve the quality of care, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance the patient experience for chronic conditions like diabetes (Bowen et al., 2018).

Need for Policy

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations for preventing and managing diabetes. These guidelines emphasize on regular blood glucose monitoring, medication, and lifestyle changes such as healthy eating patterns. Implementing the ADA guidelines can help healthcare providers improve the quality of care for diabetic patients and reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications (Chung et al., 2020).

The Chronic Care Model (CCM) aims to improve the quality of care for chronic conditions such as diabetes. The CCM intends a patient-centered care approach involving a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers working together to provide coordinated and personalized care. Implementing the CCM can help healthcare organizations improve patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance the patient experience (Yeoh et al., 2018).

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

The National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) is a lifestyle change program designed to manage and prevent diabetes in diabetic patients. The NDPP emphasizes lifestyle changes and modifications that include proper daily physical activity, and ideal body weight. This will help diabetic patients to control diabetes. Implementing the NDPP can help hospitals to reduce diabetes prevalence and improve the health outcomes (Baucom et al., 2022).

Evidence-based Strategies for Working with Role Group

Using the evidence-based practice (EBP) model, healthcare workers in Mercy Medical Center can assess relevant research findings and apply them to prevent, identify, and control diabetes. Healthcare providers can select the most appropriate treatment approaches by making decisions based on the most recent research evidence (Yoo et al., 2019). These approaches include medication prescriptions, lifestyle activities, and behavioral therapies for each patient’s preferences. EBP help to promote patient safety by focusing on continuous monitoring and evaluating outcomes to improve the quality of care (Koota et al., 2021).

The team-based care approach promotes collaboration and coordination among medical staff, diabetic patients, and family members. Working collaboratively in a role group can enhance patient health outcomes. The team can develop individualized care plans according to the requirements of diabetic patients by considering health history and medication reports. This approach emphasizes on the importance of patient-centered care. Team-based care can improve collaboration and coordination, which leads to patient health outcomes (Levengood et al., 2019).

Effective communication is a critical component of collaborative work among role groups in healthcare. Communication strategies that promote a clear and timely exchange of information can help healthcare professionals work together more efficiently and effectively, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes. Care providers can better understand each other’s roles and responsibilities when communicating effectively. They can identify potential challenges and develop solutions that benefit the patient and the healthcare team (Ratna, 2019).

Positive Consequences

Implementing evidence-based practice, team-based care approaches, and effective communication can have the following positive consequences; Role groups can enhance diabetic patients’ health outcomes by providing a personalized treatment plan. Clear communication between care providers or role groups can reduce medication errors and promote patient safety. By working collaboratively with the entire team can enhance patient satisfaction. EBP can help decision-making based on the latest research that enhances health outcomes (Koota et al., 2021).

Efficacy of Strategies

Effective communication can help define the roles of each group member, which helps reduce medication errors and enhance patient safety. Evidence-based practices for diabetes management can promote accurate decision-making for the tailored treatment plan according to the needs of diabetic patients. Team-based care promotes coordination and collaboration, eventually leading to high-quality care provision and health outcomes (Levengood et al., 2019).

Measure for Early Indication of Success

Evaluating stakeholders’ engagement levels is crucial to measure the success of a new policy in Mercy Medical Center. This can be accomplished by providing role groups with education and training, involving decision-making, and establishing clear goals to track progress. Stakeholder support and engagement are essential for successfully implementing new policies and evaluating their impact on patient care and outcomes (Heckert et al., 2020).

Impact of New Policy and Practice Guidelines

Mercy medical center can employ EBP approaches and diabetes management policies to achieve its targeted benchmark level.  Routine HgbA1c testing is a top priority per the ADA recommendations to improve patient outcomes. Medical staff should perform additional HgbA1c tests for patients with unsatisfactory HgbA1c test results to monitor their health and promote better health outcomes (Li et al., 2018). The process of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) involves assessing the effectiveness of different treatment approaches. It entails selecting the most suitable option for each patient’s needs and preferences based on the latest research evidence (Saunders et al., 2019).

Policies and Guidelines

The National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP) aims to manage and prevent diabetes in patients with the condition through a lifestyle change program. The program emphasizes modifying habits such as healthy eating, regular physical activity, and maintaining a healthy body weight to reduce the risk of diabetes. The NDPP has proven to be an effective strategy for reducing the prevalence of diabetes and improving health outcomes for at-risk individuals by promoting healthy lifestyle changes (Sauder et al., 2020).

NHS-FPX 6004 :Capella University

The CCM is a patient-centered framework that involves a multidisciplinary team of healthcare providers working collaboratively to provide personalized and proactive care. Implementing the CCM can lead to better patient outcomes, decreased healthcare costs, and an improved patient experience. The CCM improve blood pressure and cholesterol management while reducing hospitalization rates for patients with diabetes (Del & McDonnell, 2018).  

Effect of Policy on Work and Responsibilities of Role Group

Implementing policies and guidelines, such as CCM, ADA, and NDPP, has positively impacted the roles of role groups. By providing comprehensive guidelines, role group carry out their tasks efficiently and improve patient outcomes. The ADA’s guidelines have positive impact on the work and responsibilities of healthcare stakeholders. These provide guidelines for diabetes prevention which help nurses in decision-making. For example, the ADA’s emphasis on routine HgbA1c testing awareness about the importance of diabetes monitoring (Hallberg et al., 2019).

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Training Session for Policy Implementation

The implementation of NDPP positively impacts the work and responsibilities of role groups, including doctors, nurses, administrative faculty, and patients. Role groups are tasked with educating patients on the benefits of lifestyle changes and practices and monitoring and assessing patient progress toward their health goals. The NDPP requires healthcare providers to take a more proactive role in preventing diabetes by identifying at-risk patients and providing early intervention to prevent the condition’s onset (Sauder et al., 2020).

Importance of Policy and Practice Guidelines

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3, Proposed policies and guidelines, such as a team-based approach, CCM, NDPP, and ADA, have greatly improved diabetes management and outcomes. By promoting self-management education and healthy lifestyle changes, healthcare providers can prevent and control diabetes-related complications, leading to more effective diabetes control. By promoting the Hgba1C test level and awareness of the importance of test for diabetes prevention, mercy medical center help reduce the prevalence of diabetes and related complications (Rasmussen et al., 2020). 

Persuasive Arguments to Role Group

As healthcare providers and stakeholders, it is crucial to recognize the impact of diabetes on public health and take action to manage and prevent it. Mercy medical center can improve patient health outcomes by implementing policies and programs, such as the ADA, CCM, and NDPP. These policies promote a patient-centered approach that focuses on the prevention, and early detection of diabetes, leading to better overall health outcomes (Bowen et al., 2018).

Role Group’s Importance in Implementing Policy

Implementation of policies required role group support. They can provide resources to ensure the successful implementation of diabetes policies and programs, including allocating funds, equipment, and personnel. Patients should be involved in policy development to ensure that policies and guidelines align with their needs and priorities (Holmes et al., 2019). Nurses and doctors play a vital role in the implementation of diabetes policies by ensuring that patients receive timely and appropriate care and by monitoring patient progress and outcomes. By involving all relevant role groups in the policy development and implementation, mercy medical center can create a more comprehensive approach to diabetes management, ultimately improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs (Park et al., 2018).

Learning Activities for a Training Session

Learning activities such as interviews will be conducted to gather concepts and ideologies of role groups. Gathering participant feedback through interviews can provide valuable insights that can help tailor the training program to their needs and address their concerns. By evolving the training program to meet the participants’ needs, to ensure that the training is effective.  Training participants gain the knowledge and skills to manage diabetes (Huppert et al., 2021).

In diabetes prevention and management, simulation-based learning can simulate situations where patients have different needs, preferences, and health statuses. Participants can practice communication skills, and problem-solving techniques, enhancing their ability to provide patient-centered care. Additionally, simulation-based learning can train participants to use medical devices, such as insulin pumps to improve their skills (Sarfati et al., 2018).

Stakeholders’ Involvement and Collaboration

The multidisciplinary healthcare team approach to diabetes management is crucial for achieving optimal patient outcomes. Patients receive comprehensive care by combining the expertise of various stakeholders, including all role group members. This approach improves patient outcomes and ensures that healthcare resources are used efficiently (Tan et al., 2020).

NHS FPX 6004 Assessment 3 Capella University

Additionally, stakeholder engagement can foster a collaborative environment that encourages innovation and the sharing of best practices. This collaboration can lead to improved quality of care and patient satisfaction. The multidisciplinary healthcare team approach in diabetes management and its success depends on the involvement and commitment of all stakeholders (Taberna, 2020).

Conclusion

Mercy Medical Center has a vital role to play in the prevention and management of diabetes. Evidence-based policies, collaborative team-based care, and effective communication among stakeholders can greatly benefit diabetes patients. Meeting benchmark metrics, such as HgbA1c tests, is crucial for ensuring high-quality care and can impact patient outcomes. By combining simulation-based education and policy guidelines, healthcare professionals can develop practical skills for diabetes management. These approaches can enable healthcare professionals to provide high-quality care to patients with diabetes. This is essential for preventing complications, improving patient outcomes, and meeting benchmark metrics.

References

Baucom, K. J. W., Bauman, T., Gutierrez , M., Nemirovsky, Y., Aguirre, M. C., Ramos, C., Asnaani, A., Gutner, C. A., Ritchie, N. D., & Shah, M. (2022). Barriers to participation and lifestyle change among lower versus higher income participants in the National Diabetes Prevention Program: Lifestyle coach perspectives. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 12(8), 860–869.

https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibac032

Bowen, M. E., Schmittdiel, J. A., Kullgren, J. T., Ackermann, R. T., & O’Brien, M. J. (2018). Building toward a population-based approach to diabetes screening and prevention for US adults. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(11), 104.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1090-5

Chung, W. K., Erion, K., Florez, J. C., Hattersley, A. T., Hivert, M. F., Lee, C. G., McCarthy, M. I., Nolan, J. J., Norris, J. M., Pearson, E. R., Philipson, L., McElvaine, A. T., Cefalu, W. T., Rich, S. S., & Franks, P. W. (2020). Precision medicine in diabetes: A consensus report from the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care, 43(7), 1617–1635.

https://doi.org/10.2337/dci20-0022

Del, V. K. L., & McDonnell, M. E. (2018). Chronic care management services for complex diabetes management: A practical overview. Current Diabetes Reports, 18(12), 135.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-018-1118-x

Hallberg, S. J., Dockter, N. E., Kushner, J. A., & Athinarayanan, S. J. (2019). Improving the scientific rigor of nutritional recommendations for adults with type 2 diabetes: A comprehensive review of the American Diabetes Association guideline‐recommended eating patterns. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, 21(8), 1769–1779.

https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.13736

Heckert, A., Forsythe, L. P., Carman, K. L., Frank, L., Hemphill, R., Elstad, E. A., Esmail, L., & Lesch, J. K. (2020). Researchers, patients, and other stakeholders’ perspectives on challenges to and strategies for engagement. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00227-0

Holmes, L., Cresswell, K., Williams, S., Parsons, S., Keane, A., Wilson, C., Islam, S., Joseph, O., Miah, J., Robinson, E., & Starling, B. (2019). Innovating public engagement and patient involvement through strategic collaboration and practice. Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1).

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0160-4

Huppert, L. A., Hsiao, E. C., Cho, K. C., Marquez, C., Chaudhry, R. I., Frank, J., Goglin, S. E., Hsu, G., Kathpalia, P., Khanna, R., Kompala, T., Rao, M. N., Bower, B. A., Trafas, V., Santhosh, L., Schwartz, B. S., & Babik, J. M. (2021). Virtual interviews at graduate medical education training programs: Determining evidence-based best practices. Academic Medicine, 96(8), 1137–1145.

https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003868

Koota, E., Kääriäinen, M., Kyngäs, H., Lääperi, M., & Melender, H. (2021). Effectiveness of Evidence‐Based Practice (EBP) Education on emergency nurses’ EBP attitudes, knowledge, self‐efficacy, skills, and behavior: A randomized controlled Trial. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(1).

https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12485

Levengood, T. W., Peng, Y., Xiong, K. Z., Song, Z., Elder, R., Ali, M. K., Chin, M. H., Allweiss, P., Hunter, C. M., & Becenti, A. (2019). Team-based care to improve diabetes management: A community guide meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 57(1), 17–26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.02.005

Li, G., Han, L., Wang, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Fu, J., Li, M., Gao, S., & Willi, S. M. (2018). Evaluation of ADA HbA1c criteria in the diagnosis of pre-diabetes and diabetes in a population of Chinese adolescents and young adults at high risk for diabetes: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 8(8), 020665.

NHS-FPX 6004 :Capella University

https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020665

Park, M., Giap, T.-T.-T., Lee, M., Jeong, H., Jeong, M., & Go, Y. (2018). Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: A review of systematic reviews. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 87(1), 69–83.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.07.006

Rasmussen, L., Poulsen, C. W., Kampmann, U., Smedegaard, S. B., Ovesen, P. G., & Fuglsang, J. (2020). Diet and healthy lifestyle in the management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Nutrients, 12(10), 3050.

https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12103050

Ratna, H. (2019). The importance of effective communication in healthcare practice. Harvard Public Health Review, 23(23), 1–6.

https://doi.org/10.2307/48546767

Sarfati, L., Ranchon, F., Vantard, N., Schwiertz, V., Larbre, V., Parat, S., Faudel, A., & Rioufol, C. (2018). Human-simulation-based learning to prevent medication error: A systematic review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 25(1), 11–20.

https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.12883

Sauder, K. A., Ritchie, N. D., Crowe, B., Cox, E., Hudson, M., & Wadhwa, S. (2020). Participation and weight loss in online National Diabetes Prevention Programs: A comparison of age and gender subgroups. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(2), 342–350.

NHS-FPX 6004 :Capella University

https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/ibaa048

Saunders, H., Gallagher, F, L., Kvist, T., & Vehviläinen, J, K. (2019). Practicing healthcare professionals’ evidence‐based practice competencies: An overview of systematic Reviews. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(3), 176–185.

https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12363

Taberna, M. (2020). The Multidisciplinary Team (MDT) approach and quality of care. Frontiers in Oncology, 10(85).

https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00085

Tan, H. Q. M., Chin, Y. H., Ng, C. H., Liow, Y., Devi, M. K., Khoo, C. M., & Goh, L. H. (2020). A multidisciplinary team approach to diabetes. An outlook on providers’ and patients’ perspectives. Primary Care Diabetes, 14(5), 545–551.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.05.012

Yeoh, E. K., Wong, M. C. S., Wong, E. L. Y., Yam, C., Poon, C. M., Chung, R. Y., Chong, M., Fang, Y., Wang, H. H. X., Liang, M., Cheung, W. W. L., Chan, C. H., Zee, B., & Coats, A. J. S. (2018). Benefits and limitations of implementing Chronic Care Model (CCM) in primary care programs: A systematic review. International Journal of Cardiology, 258, 279–288.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.057

Yoo, J. Y., Kim, J. H., Kim, J. S., Kim, H. L., & Ki, J. S. (2019). Clinical nurses’ beliefs, knowledge, organizational readiness and level of implementation of evidence-based practice: The first step to creating an evidence-based practice culture. Plos One, 14(12), 1–15.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226742

Explore our other nursing samples for further assistance and resources.