Skip to content 
Introduction:
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2, Among the diseases which cause major difficulties in healthcare is Chronic Kidney Disease due to its prevalence, complications, management complexity as well as the costs associated with its treatment. Based on the outcomes of the evidence-based research, this will be useful in tackling these issues successfully. This paper explains how evidence-based methods (EBP) are applied in chronic kidney diseases management and evaluates the usefulness of sources, during which evidence-based strategies will be integrated to improve diagnosis and treatment of this disease.
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)
Chronic Kidney Disease is becoming a very big Quality and Safety issue in medical settings as a result of its availability, complications linked to it, and its management complexity. The incidence of CKD patients is around the world with a huge number of individuals and associated with serious health complications that may lead to death, such as heart attacks, strokes, and organ dysfunction (Cheung et al., 2021). The patients with CKD afflicts are faced with an increased risk of developing conditions including cardiovascular disease, electrolyte imbalances, and ESRD, which would make their quality of life much poorer, the utilization of their health care, and increase health care costs.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Rationale for Applying an Evidence-Based Approach
The employment of an evidence-based approach is indispensable when it comes to managing chronic kidney disease for several reasons. The effectiveness of evidence-based practice in treatment has been proven and, as a result, helps enhance the quality of healthcare providers who give to individuals with CKD (Shlipak et al., 2020). By resolving evidence-based guidelines and recommendations, healthcare providers can select the treatments that favor clinical outcomes, arrest the disease progression, and reduce the risk of CKD complications (Cheung et al., 2021).
The complex management of CKD highlights that the best decisions are successfully based on the evidence process. Being familiar with the co-morbidities and numerous treatments available, healthcare workers must be sure about the best evidence they have as they practice their profession (Persson et al., 2021). Through the employment of evidence-based guidelines and protocols, a standardized way of managing this kind of renal disorder is tried to mitigate. It invariably reduces the variation of care delivery while standardizing care practices.
Literature Support for Evidence-Based Practice in CKD
Numerous evidence-based practice (EBP) studies have shown the positive impacts of EBPs in providing CKD care. One way of illustrating this is the author’s concise points in the clinical practice guidelines of Cheung et al. (2021), which precisely indicate the centrality of evidence-based interventions for blood pressure management in patients with CKD. By putting into practice suggestions of evidence, health professionals can control hypertension, a common complication in CKD patients, and avoid severe consequences for the cardiovascular system and kidneys (Hebert & Ibrahim, 2022).
Furthermore, Mahmood’s (2021) article accentuates telehealth and online resources’ contributions to communication and collaboration among healthcare professionals engaged in chronic kidney disease care. With the employment of communication technology-assisted methods, healthcare groups can share evidence-based knowledge, rally around patient care decisions, monitor patient progress effectively, and, in the long run, help improve the health outcomes for CKD patients (Fang et al., 2022).
Criteria for Determining Credibility of Resources
When the credibility of resources is affected by the evaluation process, several criteria should be considered to make an analysis of the information reliable and trustful.
Authority and Expertise:
Another consideration is the connection between the presented information and the author’s or creators’ presentation expertise. Assessing the requirements and skills possessed by these personnel involved in the content creation process gives an idea about the depth of the knowledge they use in their research. For journal articles, this information stays as the author affiliations and credentials are normally included at the beginning of the article. An example can involve assuming that websites would require an “About Us” or an “Author Bio” page in order to find out the credentials of the authors or the creators (Sye, 2023). To convert this criterion into a distinct measure for a particular resource will require verification of the authors’ backgrounds and up-to-dateness of the data in the area of competence.
NURS FPX 4030 Assessment 2: Publication or Source Reputation:
Another criterion of credibility is the standing of the media or source, which also constitutes a criterion. Reputable and peer-reviewed scientific journals with a high impact factor rate are normally considered good sources of information. Just like in the case of websites, highly technical organizations, and higher educational institutions that are credible are usually more trusted than individual blogs and commercial websites (Kimmons, 2020). Evaluation of the reputation of the publication or source includes finding its history, the theme, and previous products like journals or contents it had. One can analyze the resource (a particular journal or website publisher, for instance) using such criteria to review its reputation and compare it to the already established standards of credibility and reliability (Suiter & Sarli, 2019).
Importance of Incorporating Credible Evidence into Evidence-Based Practice
In most cases, EBP works effectively across quality, safety, diagnosis, and management of healthcare conditions. EBP is the best practice when addressing quality or safety issues and diagnosing and managing healthcare conditions (Stannard, 2021). The presence of credible evidence in EBP is important. Through such reutilizing diplomacy proofs, diplomatic providers can improve patients’ health conditions, increase utilization, and reduce the potential risks of suboptimal care practices (Jasna Karačić Zanetti et al., 2023). In terms of sound evidence authority, the practice enhancement approach is built on solid evidence as it helps guide health workers into applying knowledge tested through scientific practices.
Example of Improvement in CKD Diagnosis and Management
For example, suppose we work with an evidence-based practice model like the Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) model. In that case, we can develop and implement processes that can help diagnose and manage Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD). Not only do we blend authentic proofs in every phase of the KTA Modal, but healthcare providers also get the upper hand in affecting the effectiveness and efficiency of CKD care delivery (Tariq et al., 2022). In the second stage of the KTA Model, i.e., “Knowledge Creation,” healthcare providers look for credible sources of evidence, such as peer-reviewed journals and clinical guidelines, that will enable them to obtain a profound understanding of CKD pathophysiology, risk factors, and diagnostic criteria (Muscedere et al., 2023). It forms the basis for consolidating conceptual thinking and directing clinical care and professional practices by the best guidelines.
During this “Action Cycle” stage, healthcare providers are implementers. They turn evidence-based evidence-based knowledge into practice by designing and developing interventions and protocols customized for CKD diagnosis and treatment. As an example, evidence-based guidelines from respected sources like The National Kidney Foundation (NKF) may propose checking the kidney function regularly using laboratory tests and microscopic analysis of urine together with lifestyle adjustments as well as treatments with medications that slow the spread of disease and manage complications (Lentine et al., 2021). The KTA model, by equipping healthcare providers with evidence-based recommendations, allows them to maximize the diagnosis and management of CKD thus, quality care and minimal healthcare costs can be achieved together because of improved outcomes.
Conclusion
As regards to the management of Chronic Kidney diseases, it is pertinent that credible evidence be made use of for the improvement of the patients and the cutting of health care costs. By implementing programs and interventions indicative of the best clinical practice, physicians can enhance the quality of treatment by reducing differences in practicing. Exploitation of the models such as the KTA model (Knowledge to Action) grants healthcare specialists the opportunity to apply evidence-based strategies to clinical practice and, eventually, leads to positive outcomes and healthier patients in the face of this complex (complicated) condition.
References
Fang, J.-T., Chen, S.-Y., Tian, Y.-C., Lee, C.-H., Wu, I-Wen., Kao, C.-Y., Lin, C.-C., & Tang, W.-R. (2022). Effectiveness of end-stage renal disease communication skills training for healthcare personnel: A single-center, single-blind, randomized study. BMC, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03458-9
Hebert, S. A., & Ibrahim, H. N. (2022). Hypertension management in patients with chronic kidney disease. Methodist DeBakey Cardiovascular Journal, 18(4), 41–49.
https://doi.org/10.14797/mdcvj.1119
Jasna Karačić Zanetti, Brown, M., Viđak, M., & Marušić, A. (2023). Diplomatic response to global health challenges in recognizing patient needs: A qualitative interview study. BMC, 11(3).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1164940
Kimmons, R. (2020). Information literacy. The K-12 Educational Technology Handbook, 6(3), 51–63.
https://edtechbooks.org/k12handbook/online_resources
Muscedere, J., Bebenek, S. G., Stockley, D., Kinderman, L., & Barrie, C. (2023). Canadian frailty network (CFN) national conference abstracts. Canadian Geriatrics Journal, 20(3), 120–197.
https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.20.284
Persson, M. H., Mogensen, C. B., Søndergaard, J., Skjøt-Arkil, H., & Andersen, P. T. (2021). Healthcare professionals’ practice and interactions in older peoples’ cross-sectoral clinical care trajectories when acutely hospitalized – a qualitative observation study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06953-9
Shlipak, M. G., Tummalapalli, S. L., Boulware, L. E., Grams, M. E., Ix, J. H., Jha, V., Kengne, A. P., Madero, M., Mihaylova, B., Tangri, N., Cheung, M., Jadoul, M., Winkelmayer, W. C., & Zoungas, S. (2020). The case for early identification and intervention of chronic kidney disease: Conclusions from a kidney disease: Improving global outcomes (KDIGO) controversies conference. Kidney International, 99(1).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2020.10.012
Stannard, D. (2021). Problem identification: The first step in evidence‐based practice. AORN Journal, 113(4), 377–378.
https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13359
Suiter, A. M., & Sarli, C. C. (2019). Selecting a journal for publication: Criteria to consider. Missouri Medicine, 116(6), 461–465.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6913840/
Sye, D. (2023). LibGuides: Racer library tutorial – SOC 359 and POL 359: Evaluating resources. Lib.murraystate.edu.
https://lib.murraystate.edu/libSOC359POL359/evaluate
Tariq, M. H., Sulaiman, S. A. S., Farrukh, M. J., Goh, K. W., & Ming, L. C. (2022). Development and validation of chronic kidney disease knowledge, attitude, and practices (CKD-KAP) questionnaire. Frontiers in Medicine, 9(3).
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.956449
Explore our other nursing samples for further assistance and resources.
