Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1, This research examines Mercy Medical Center’s Dashboard Metrics, focusing on important performance factors related to patient care in diabetes treatment. The center’s criteria include Hgb1Ac level measurements as well as eye and foot examinations, which have earned it recognition for excellence. The report addresses information gaps, the repercussions of benchmark underperformance, and recommends ethical improvements through a thorough investigation of dashboard metrics provided by the quality assurance leader. This analysis gives useful insights for improving organizational procedures, assuring quality healthcare delivery, and meeting specified goals.
Evaluation of Dashboard Metrics
Mercy Medical Center’s strong standard of care and safe clinical techniques used to improve outcomes make it one of Shakopee’s greatest healthcare institutions. The Center’s dashboard indicators provide a comprehensive perspective of healthcare activities, notably diabetes management. The essential criteria include Hgb1Ac values, eye and foot exams.
Hgb1Ac Level Measurements:
The statistics show changes in the number of Hgb1Ac level tests performed during the evaluation period. Notably, there was a considerable reduction in the fourth quarter of 2019, raising questions about the uniformity of testing procedures. However, there was a positive recovery in 2020, with an increase in total number of tests. Further investigation should be undertaken to uncover the reasons behind the decline.
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Capella University
Eye Examinations:
The dashboard provides details on the frequency of eye checkups. While the number of eye exams grew from 2019 to 2020, the test-to-population ratio in Shakopee remains very low. This points to a potential gap in outreach efforts or accessibility. Understanding the factors that influence this ratio will be critical for developing focused measures to boost eye examination rates among diabetics.
Foot Examination:
Foot examination data indicate the number of tests increased somewhat between 2019 and 2020. While this is a favorable trend, further investigation is needed to determine whether this increase is equal to the expansion in the diabetic patient population. Also, the demographic profile of patients undergoing foot examinations provides insight into the diversity of people receiving preventative care.
FPX-6004 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
Demographic Distribution:
Assessing the demographic distribution of individuals undergoing examinations is critical to ensuring equal healthcare. The data shows that the majority of white patients participated in the tests, exposing potential inequities. Addressing this disparity will be crucial to promoting inclusivity and providing comprehensive treatment to people from varied backgrounds. Diabetes, a global health concern, affects an estimated 463 million people worldwide, with the figure anticipated to reach 700 million by 2045 (Sugandh et al., 2023). Diabetes, a chronic metabolic disorder, presents considerable problems to worldwide public health systems. To deliver evidence-based and comprehensive care, benchmarking against established guidelines from recognized sources such as the World Health Organization, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) is critical.
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
Gaps in Information
During the review of the dashboard metrics, significant gaps emerged, each adding to a more detailed understanding of opportunities for development. A key gap in the available data concerns the healthcare workforce—specifically, their numbers and various backgrounds. This difference raises concerns about the center’s ability to properly satisfy the different cultural demands of its patients. Another major vacuum is information on patients’ ethnicities in relation to specific tests, which restricts targeted outreach efforts. Equally important is the neglect of information about patients’ socioeconomic situation and educational background, which are critical determinants in creating personalized healthcare interventions. Furthermore, the lack of a comparison analysis with peer organizations restricts the center’s capacity to assess its performance against the competitive landscape. To strengthen the evaluation process, it is critical to solve these informational gaps and ensure that the dashboard contains full data for educated decision-making, streamlined organizational structures, and optimal operational methods.Top of Form
Consequences of not Meeting the Prescribed Benchmarks
Mercy Medical Center’s failure to fulfill targets, as seen by dashboard data, has serious ramifications for both the corporation and its healthcare providers. Failure to meet benchmarks jeopardizes patient outcomes, limiting the ability to provide tailored and culturally appropriate therapy, as seen by poor Hgb1Ac level readings. Financially, this failure causes inefficiencies and higher costs, as insufficient patient data impedes cost-effective actions (Fuseini et al., 2023). Furthermore, the lack of competitive benchmarking impedes strategic positioning in the healthcare sector, restricting organizational success (Willmington et al., 2022).
FPX-6004 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
Acknowledging assumptions is critical, especially when acknowledging that comprehensive data fosters better decision-making and patient outcomes. Addressing these implications necessitates a comprehensive approach informed by evidence-based healthcare management principles, including targeted interventions to close data gaps and align practices with benchmarks (Kruk et al., 2019; Levine et al.).
Evaluation of Benchmark Underperformance
The analysis of benchmark underperformance at the Center provides essential information into particular areas where the institution falls short of established criteria. Notably, the observed decrease in the frequency of Hgb1Ac level tests in the fourth quarter of 2019 raises questions regarding the uniformity of testing procedures. This reduction, discovered through a detailed study of dashboard measures, needs an investigation into potential contributing variables and specific solutions. In contrast, the subsequent increase in 2020 represents positive progress but deserves further examination into the sustainability of this improvement.
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Dashboard Metrics Evaluation
On top of that, the lower-than-expected ratio of eye and foot tests per whole population in Shakopee indicates potential limitations in outreach efforts or accessibility. This disparity, when compared to advice from respectable sources such as the American Diabetes Association, warrants a thorough examination of the impediments impeding achievement of set goals. Addressing these underperformance concerns is crucial for improving patient care and aligning practices with established standards, according to research in the Journal of Healthcare Quality and the Journal of General Internal Medicine (Wu et al., 2023; Li et al., 2021).
Ethical Actions to Address Benchmark Underperformance
It will take long-term, ethical initiatives that are appropriate for all the stakeholders involved to address benchmark underperformance at Mercy Medical Center. In order to uphold ethical principles, the healthcare facility ought to promote openness and dialogue, informing patients of steps taken to enhance benchmark metrics. Instilling a sense of accountability and ownership also requires fostering a collaborative approach that involves including healthcare staff in decision-making processes.
NURS FPX 6004 Assessment 1 Capella University
These activities should be guided by sustainability goals that highlight long-term benefits for patient care. Putting in place thorough training programs that include cultural sensitivity and competency for healthcare personnel is in line with the moral precepts of inclusion and equity (Stubbe, 2020). Moreover, defining precise guidelines for gathering and disclosing data promotes openness, which is necessary to create and preserve patient and community trust (Mangal et al., 2022). Prioritizing sustainability objectives and ethical issues will allow the medical center to make significant changes and set the stage for higher benchmark performance.
Conclusion
At last, Mercy Medical Center’s thorough review of dashboard indicators demonstrates its commitment to providing excellent healthcare. Identified gaps and benchmark underperformance provide chances for improvement, which is critical for maximizing patient care and organizational success. The repercussions of not fulfilling benchmarks highlight the importance of strategic actions. Ethical practices based on openness and sustainability emerge as critical in addressing difficulties and promoting positive change. As the medical center navigates these insights, it has the opportunity to improve its procedures, comply with established standards, and provide more inclusive and effective healthcare to its varied patient group.
References
Fuseini, A.-K. J., Teixeira da Costa, E. I. M., Matos, F. A. S. de, Merino-Godoy, M.-A., & Nave, F. (2023). Patient-Safety Culture among Emergency and Critical Care Nurses in a Maternal and Child Department. Healthcare (2227-9032), 11(20), 2770.
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11202770
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., Adeyi, O., Barker, P., Daelmans, B., Doubova, S. V., English, M., Elorrio, E. G., Guanais, F., Gureje, O., Hirschhorn, L. R., Jiang, L., Kelley, E., Lemango, E. T., Liljestrand, J., & Malata, A. (2019). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), e1196–e1252.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7734391/
Levine, S., Malone, E., Lekiachvili, A., & Briss, P. (2019). Health Care Industry Insights: Why the Use of Preventive Services Is Still Low. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16(16).
https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180625
Li, Y., Cao, L., Zhang, J., Jiang, Y., Han, Y., & Wei, J. (2021). Energy Benchmarking in Healthcare Facilities: A Comparative Study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11).
https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0002183
Mangal, S., Park, L., Reading Turchioe, M., Choi, J., Niño de Rivera, S., Myers, A., Goyal, P., Dugdale, L., & Masterson Creber, R. (2022). Building trust in research through information and intent transparency with health information: representative cross-sectional survey of 502 US adults. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(9), 1535–1545.
https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac084
Stubbe, D. E. (2020). Practicing Cultural Competence and Cultural Humility in the Care of Diverse Patients. Focus, 18(1), 49–51.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20190041
Sugandh, F. N. U., Chandio, M., Raveena, F. N. U., Kumar, L., Karishma, F. N. U., Khuwaja, S., Memon, U. A., Bai, K., Kashif, M., Varrassi, G., Khatri, M., Kumar, S., Sugandh, F., Chandio, M., Raveena, F. N. U., Kumar, L., Karishma, F. N. U., Khuwaja, S., Memon, U. A., & Bai, K. (2023). Advances in the Management of Diabetes Mellitus: A Focus on Personalized Medicine. Cureus, 15(8).
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.43697
Varkey, B. (2020). Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17–28.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000509119
Willmington, C., Belardi, P., Murante, A. M., & Vainieri, M. (2022). The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1).
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8
Wu, Y., Li, S., Yuan, J., Zhang, H., Wang, M., Zhang, Z., & Qin, R. (2023). Benchmarking: a novel measuring tool for outcome comparisons in surgery. International Journal of Surgery, 109(3), 419–428.
https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000000212
Explore our other nursing samples for further assistance and resources.