...

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

Ready to turn inspiration into action? Explore our Nursing Care Plan Writing Service now and transform your vision into reality with our expert assistance.

Curriculum Evaluation

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum evaluation review is defined as a systematic and continuous process that is carried out in the nursing field to evaluate the effectiveness of the programs that are used for training nurses. It consists of analysis of the structure and components of the curriculum, objectives of the curriculum, methods of teaching and learning, and the outcomes in order to ascertain its relevance to the needs of the nursing profession and the healthcare industry. Another crucial process in the curriculum review is to ensure that the lessons that the students are learning are in tune with the current standards, policies and practices in the health care industry. This ensures that nurses are well informed and skilled to handle patients in the best way possible with the least risks. It could also be possible for the assessors to confirm whether the program cover the general nursing skills, clinical skills and the EBPs sufficiently (Aul et al. , 2021).

Analysis of the program also seeks for its strengths and weaknesses and how the program can be improved and new ideas formulated. This could involve making the interviews with students, teachers, and health care workers to find out to what extent the program is readying the nurses for difficulties they can encounter in practice. Most of the time, assessing is about searching for ways to assess students, to do clinical practice, and to include technology and simulations into the lessons (Graham & McAleer, 2018). The purpose of this assessment is to assess the curriculum of Capella University with regard to the course design and curriculum research.

An Overview of the Curriculum

The course specified in the learning institution Capella University’s BSN program as “Advanced Pharmacology and Medication Management” is intended to prepare the nursing students for what they ought to know about pharmacology and drug management in the health care system. This course is further development of the preceding nursing classes and focuses on the fact that pharmacotherapeutics are not a piece of cake.

 These are some of the areas of pharmacology that will be covered in this class including; drug classification, drug modes of action/ action of drugs, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and how drugs affect the body systems. They will also get to know about the safety in taking drugs, the prevention of errors, and adverse effects of drugs.

 This will also entail evidence based practice in drug management whereby the students will be empowered to reason on what is right for their patients and hence the right medicine to administer. The students will learn that it is crucial to inform the patients as well as explain matters to them in detail so that they can adhere to the laid down medication schedules and get the best results from their treatments (Oliveira et al. , 2020).

 In addition, it is possible to apply the knowledge about medications management in case scenarios, discussions, and practical tasks during the course. NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 advanced pharmacology course acquaints the nursing students with the art of administering the medicines safely and effectively in various health care settings while maintaining patient centered care. It provides them with the information they require to make correct decisions concerning drug treatment and also assist patient outcomes.

Importance of Curriculum Evaluation

Thus, all the educational programs including the Capella University BSN program should continue evaluating their courses. That is why we need it: getting the program right, keeping it right, and right for the future of healthcare. This ongoing evaluation is useful for many people including students, teachers, schools, and the healthcare industry.

 First, it is pertinent for the kids that the program is always undergoing assessment. There is also the achievement of quality education that enables them to acquire necessary knowledge and skills suitable for nursing professions. Testing often allows alterations to be made to prepare for new practices in healthcare to ensure graduates are prepared for the work setting (Japee & Oza, 2021). It is also good for faculty members because they are always reviewed on the program on a continuous basis. It enables them to know how they are doing as far as teaching is concerned and the effectiveness of the program respectively. It assists teachers in enhancing their teaching methods, following the current tendencies and enhancing students’ learning process (Lucander & Christersson, 2020).

 One of the strategies which institutions like Capella University use to meet the society’s expectation is to review the curriculum frequently. This is because accreditation groups may from time to time require a continuous assessment of the quality of programs. This can assist the universities’ objective and attract more students. NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 health care business also benefits (Kumar et al. , 2020). Routine examination seeks to confirm that the nursing schools equip the students adequately to assist patients in a most safe and efficient manner as provided by the recommended standard nursing practices. Lastly, this enhances the quality of health care services and thus enhances the health status of the patients (Flaubert et al., 2021).

Impact of Not Evaluating the Curriculum

Several negative consequences can occur if the program is not reviewed from time to time. First, there are learning resources and techniques that are either obsolete or ineffective, which are still applied; this results in a mismatch between the knowledge that the students acquire and the requirements of their work. For instance, if the nursing school has not revised its curriculum, the students may be taught on how to perform certain tasks that may no longer be applicable in the current practice, which may end up putting the patient’s life at risk and reduce the quality of care graduates offer (Nevenglosky et al. , 2019).

 Second, the programs may not be in a position to alter their design to suit the society and the business as they transform if the evaluation is not done from time to time. For instance, health care sector is a dynamic one and there are new diseases, new medicines and new tools that are coming in the market. Now let’s take a case of a nursing program that has not been evaluated and modified where necessary. Thus, the new problems would be beyond the knowledge and expertise of the grads, hence they would be in a poor position to provide the best care.

 Last but not the least; there is the aspect of the reputation of the school being damaged. Healthcare workers and the employers of trainees also expect trainees to be competent and knowledgeable in their fields. If a program’s curriculum remains stagnant, the graduates may not possess such skills, which may negatively affect the credibility of the institution and decrease the employability of the graduates (Beiranvand et al. , 2022).

 In order to ensure that students are well equipped and informed for a society that is evolving at a fast rate, it is necessary to assess the program from time to time. NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 evaluate and modify the curriculum leads to the provision of irrelevant information as well as what students learn may not be relevant anymore in the labor market. Given that sectors evolve and new technologies are introduced, the role of schools requires them to be able to modify their programs in a short time in order to meet the needs of the companies. The level of education is also closely associated with the image of educational organizations. If the curriculum is not revised at some interval of time, it leads to the impression that curriculum is outdated and is of no significance. This could deter possible learners and also bring the school into disrepute in the eyes of the academic world and employment. To ensure they are not only relevant in the future but also to ensure that they are graduating competent learners for the challenges that are likely to be faced, schools should therefore ensure that it is a prime aim to regularly assess and enhance the curriculum.

Criteria for Curriculum Evaluation

Curriculum review is an important element of understanding how effective and helpful a certain school program is, for instance, Capella University’s BSN program. When such kinds of appraisals are carried out then they should consider the following factors to ensure that the program is useful to the students, the teachers and the healthcare profession. All these factors can be grouped into four general categories depending on the classification that is to be used.

 The school’s aims and the overall achievement of the school should therefore be seen from the syllabus. Thus, to determine if a program is effective when conducting an evaluation, it is important to know if the program addresses the essentials or the competencies required of a nurse to perform his or her duties. This involves verifying whether or not the course material is in line with the current tendencies and standards in the health care industry (Wijngaards-de Meij & Merx, 2018).

 This paper focuses on the quality of learning and therefore the students. Make sure that the program not only engages the students, make them learn actively, and fits in to their learning modes. For better learning, it is suggested to consider the use of new technologies, teaching techniques, and tools (Pérez-delHoyo et al. , 2020).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 learning Objective

 A good program should have examinations from time to time and methods through which the teachers can communicate the performance of the students to the students and afford them an opportunity to improve. This paper also notes that evaluations should be done to determine if the assessments are valid, credible and relevant to the objectives of learning. Feedback should also be timely and should be constructive (Lim et al. , 2019).

 The assessment of the curriculum should not be limited to once in a while. It should verify whether the program can be altered based on new rules in education, technology, and health care. Opinions of both the students, the teachers and any other stakeholders should also be considered so that changes can be made for continuous improvement (Wijngaards-de Meij & Merx, 2018).

 In conclusion, it is recommended that the curriculum of Capella University’s BSN program should be analyzed in relation to the goals of the program, students’ interest, effectiveness of assessments and adaptability to change. Through proper and systematic review of the curriculum, it assures that the teaching and learning activities are relevant to the current and future trends in healthcare delivery and enhance the quality of nursing education.

Explanation

These factors are relevant in determining the quality of the coursework of Capella University’s BSN program for several reasons;: First of all, it is crucial to address the fact that it is imperative to ensure the validity of the curriculum by aligning it with the program’s objectives and outcomes. When the curriculum is in harmony with the program outcomes, then the students are able to acquire the right knowledge and skills that will enable them to be good nurses. This makes them more prepared and perhaps more capable for the job (Wijngaards-de Meij & Merx, 2018).

 Secondly, students’ engagement and the process of their learning are crucial since they influence the level of education directly. Being active in class makes the students to be more spirited up, alert and proactive in the academic activities that produce better results. An educational program that employs new methods in teaching and learning is a program that is beneficial and more useful in the learning process. NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3, methods of providing feedback and/or assessment used for monitoring the student’s progress are very helpful. Students will be able to know what they are expected to learn by correcting tests and receiving fast and useful answers as to where they can do better. This results in a culture of people being in a constant learning process (Lim et al. , 2019).

 Last but not the least, it is necessary to be flexible and continue learning, because the sphere of healthcare is constantly developing, and there always appear new technologies and norms. A good program can accommodate these changes and prepare its nursing graduates for the challenges they are going to face in the present and future (Wijngaards-de Meij & Merx, 2018). Collectively, these requirements ensure that Capella University’s BSN prepares students for quality education to enable them to succeed in the dynamic healthcare system.

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Curriculum Evaluation

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3  Pilot Testing of Curriculum Evaluation

The following are the reasons why pilot testing is important when evaluating curricula, especially the Capella University BSN program. First, pilot testing enables the new or altered part of the program to be introduced in a limited manner in order to test it out. To look for issues, errors, or areas where the program, tools, and communication can be improved, this is useful.

 Since nurse education is considered to be vital, pilot tests can play a significant role in the programs such as the BSN. This guarantees that students are trained to become competent in handling patients’ needs. Thus, providing the test curriculum to a certain group of students, teachers can learn about the effectiveness of the defined learning objectives, the chosen teaching methods and techniques, and the appropriateness of the tools used for the assessment of the students. This method based on data permits the creators of the program to make rational changes that positively influence the learning process (Gouëdard et al. , 2020).

 Also, pilot testing increase teachers and students’ participation in the process since they have to be involved. It fosters a free flow of communication to enable the teachers to know what the students are going through in terms of their learning experiences, interests and challenges. This feedback process can assist in the alteration of the courses such that they are more relevant to the students and the professionals. This will make the program better and more useful in the future, eventually (Mebert et al., 2020).

Example

The “Advanced Pharmacology and Medication Management” course is near completing the pilot testing of the new BSN program at Capella University. This important step in creating a program shall guarantee that the course is viable and effective in preparing nursing students for the current and future healthcare system. Some few students shall engage with the course materials during the pilot tests. The following are some of the topics that will be covered in the advanced pharmacology ideas and methods of handling medications. These students are going to have varying levels of skills and knowledge as will the rest of the nursing profession.

 The objectives, content, and assessment methods and tools for the course will be trialed in this first implementation phase. The students will contribute in class discussions, hand in their assignments, and share their suggestions about how they learned. The faculty will monitor the test group’s performance and check if any modifications are to be made in the course with the intention of enhancing the quality of the course and making the course meet the objectives of the program. NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 effectiveness of this sample testing will be evaluated in terms of the level of students’ satisfaction and success in the training, the extent to which the training made the students ready for their future nursing positions, and the achievement of the intended learning objectives. After this part, Capella University will complete and enhance the course based on the gathered comments and data. This will make sure that it is prepared for further use within the BSN course.

Short-Term and Long-Term Evaluation Plan

Short-term curriculum reviews for the Capella University BSN program may include checking whether some courses or classes contribute to the achievement of certain educational goals in the short term. For example, teachers could conduct diagnosis tests at the end of each term to determine the students’ perception on how well the lessons and teachers are doing. For these short term feedback, polls or group discussions could be conducted to see what needs to be changed, for instance, course work that is outdated or teaching styles which are not suitable for the students. The above findings can lead to sudden shifts in the way that courses are delivered (Yigletu et al. , 2021).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Long-term curriculum reviews for process growth, however, might check on the bigger program’s outcomes and objectives (van Tuijl et al. , 2019). As an example, Capella University can conduct a comprehensive evaluation of the BSN program every few years to check how the program correlates with the requirements of the industry, modern tendencies in healthcare, and advanced technologies. Partnering with healthcare organizations in this survey could assist to identify if graduates meet the requirements and know enough for the today practice. A baseline review that may also be done for the long-term assessment may include factors such as employment rates, occupation growth rates, and satisfaction levels of the graduates. These results would help with more changes to the program and for planning for the future of the program (van Tuijl et al., 2019).

Importance of Both Types of Evaluation

The Capella University BSN program uses both short term and long term curriculum reviews which are both significant in developing the curriculum because the two have different yet closely related functions. These are the short-term reviews that allow feedback on certain classes or courses to be made as soon as possible. They are very essential in the identification and solving of any barriers that may hinder achievement of the students. For instance, short-term evaluations can reveal to the teachers their mistakes or if the resources used in the class are still up to date. This enables them to do changes with speed. This flexibility ensures that students get the best education right from the initial classes and this boosts their happiness and learning outcomes (Vincent-Ruz et al. , 2020).

 On the other hand, the long term reviews examine the overall effectiveness of the program and how it can be relevant to the long term strategies. These reviews provide a framework of how the curriculum should be developed and thus ensure that the BSN program is up to date in the field of health care that is ever evolving. Long-term reviews examine the shifts in the industry, the progress of students and the program outcomes to make significant changes in the curriculum, determine where to allocate resources and how to expand the program. They assist in maintaining the program’s standards, image, and accreditation that guarantee the program’s sustainably and readiness of the nurse workers for the future of the health care system (Center, 2020).

Process for Implementing

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 improves the Capella University BSN program a method has to be formulated to incorporate short term evaluations and long term evaluations of the program. First of all, it is necessary to state the objectives of the review quite explicitly. In short-term assessments, you should mainly concentrate on altering particular parts of a course or a lesson. While the long term assessments should be in congruent with the goals and outcomes of the whole program. Determine the program effectiveness and efficiency, including student performance, students’ motivation, and the alignment with business requirements (Wijngaards-de Meij & Merx, 2018).

It is necessary to choose the most appropriate methods of data gathering for every type of review. For short term assessment you may use surveys, focus groups or classroom observation. For the long term outcomes assessment, one could use survey of graduates, employer feedback, and program level assessment (Vincent-Ruz et al. , 2020). Do not only collect information from students, teachers, graduates, but also from business partners of the university. Analyse the data to discover trends, opportunities, and issues. Feedbacks may occur frequently and can be on specific areas of the curriculum as opposed to the whole curriculum. Short-term assessments, however, should provide the current assessment of how effective the program is (Malhotra et al. , 2022).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 stakeholders of the results of the review, for instance teachers, managers and advisory boards. In the short-term assessments, provide recommendations for alterations that may be done immediately. It is essential to design a long-term review strategy plan for handling problems and possibilities of the program level (Issuu, 2022).

Suggestions should be implemented on the content, teaching methods, or program framework of the content of the program. The changes that can be done in the short term are implementable now while the changes that are for the long term may require time and funds to plan and execute it (Gouëdard et al. , 2020).

Stay updated with the effectiveness of the alterations that have been made. The short term reviews should incorporate the feedback loops to ensure that there is monitoring of the progress that is being made. It is recommended that the assessment should be conducted periodically to determine whether the program is still relevant to the goals of the business as it evolves (Gouëdard et al., 2020).

Improving Curriculum Design

Definitely, the nursing theories, concepts and the best practices, which are grounded on facts offered can greatly help in enhancing the coursework for a BSN school. This method ensures compliance of the new nursing school graduates to provide safe , quality and patient centered care as soon as they join the nursing profession.

 This means including the latest research findings, the current guidelines, and the most efficient strategies in the BSN program so that the students can learn the most updated and useful nursing information. Curriculum designers can incorporate the concept of EBP in a BSN program by having classes that explain the processes of identifying, assessing and applying research findings for clinical decision making. For instance, students will be able to check for the quality of study papers, and the need to make care plans using evidence. This makes sure that grads are prepared to supply care according to the most effective evidence that is currently available (Zhu et al. , 2022).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 incorporate theories into lessons, it assists the learners to gain knowledge of the concepts of nursing and how they can be used practically. This assists them in getting the big picture of the job. Include Jean Watson’s Theory of Human Caring to the lessons and ensure that there is emphasis on the need to provide caring and patient centered care. Provide more and more case studies and examples that will challenge students to apply Watson’s theories in the actual practice of medicine. This assists students in viewing the patients as medical cases and individuals at the same time.

 This entails employing the principles of teaching, testing, and program review that are based on research evidence and current guidelines in nursing education. For the skill acquisition it is recommended to apply the simulation-based learning. Develop realistic simulation situations which mimic the real life clinical conditions to the extent possible. Thus, students are able to train and enhance their performances without any real-life consequences. Based on the literature review, there is a suggestion that modeling enhances the professional competency, thinking, and decision making. Also, use diagnostic and final tests that are related to the program outcomes to check that students acquired the skills and objectives intended (Elshama, 2020).

 Therefore, the curriculum writers at the Capella University’s BSN program can design a curriculum that is grounded in nursing theories and concepts that have been deemed effective by following the suggested rules. This will also put the students in a better position to acquire the required knowledge and skills that will enable them to excel in today’s fast-paced health care environment.

Accreditation Body for the Curriculum

The course on Advanced Pharmacology and Medication Management in Capella University is accredited by the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) and Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN). These are two good American organizations that ensure that nursing education is of standard quality.

 CCNE is a famous organization that has the authority to accredit nursing schools. It is accredited by the U. S. Department of Education, which is responsible for the accreditation of nursing schools leading to the bachelor’s and master’s degrees. CCNE ensures that the nursing education programs such as Capella University’s BSN program has certain guidelines that they have to follow in regard to the content of the curriculum, the qualifications of the instructors, and the performance of the students. To this effect, the recognition of a nursing school by CCNE is evidence of the institution’s commitment to offering quality education (DelMonte et al. , 2022).

 The accreditation Council for Education in Nursing (ACEN) is another popular board that offers certification. Also, ACEN is recognized by the U. S. Department of Education, and the Department of Education regulates all the levels of nursing programs including associate, diploma, bachelor’s, and graduate levels. ACEN examines several aspects of nursing education such as the syllabus, the faculties and the performance of the students in order to confirm the quality of the program. Such accreditation of a nursing school as Capella University’s BSN program points to the fact that the school has met all the set standards for nursing education (Queen, 2023).

NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 Evaluation Criteria

The normal approval standards for educational programs such as Capella University’s BSN nursing school typically address a number of significant aspects. The program is verified by accreditation organizations so that it contains all the necessary content, is relevant, and meets the standards of the profession. This means examining the content, organizing the classes in a proper manner, as well as providing for important themes (Bogossian & Craven, 2020). Staff members’ competencies are assessed through factors such as education, experience, and practice development (King et al. , 2020).

 Accrediting agencies assess how effectively students are doing based on factors such as: graduation rates, rates of licensure examination, and employment rates. It can be said that positive outputs are observable in quality activities. For instance, well-equipped labs and practice facilities are tools that are used by the student to enhance his/her practical knowledge. Thus, to ensure that the program updates every now and then to meet the changing needs of education and business (Kareskoski, 2023), the accreditation bodies analyze whether the program is subjected to ongoing assessment and enhancement. In education, the programs have to meet the set professional and ethical guidelines. These are the issues of academic integrity, and appropriate conduct during clinical practicals (Sivasubramaniam et al., 2021).

Application of the Results

The review data has to be put to good and beneficial use. They assist institutions in enhancing the quality of their programs due to the outlining of a developmental plan. Schools can know the areas that they need to excel and the areas they need to work on through the results. Thus, to ensure that the program is compliant with the approval standards and best practices, it is necessary to implement changes and improvements described above. It can also assist in the identification of strategic decisions including budgeting and training of the personnel. Periodic assessment and further enhancement according to the results of evaluation assist in maintaining approval, guaranteeing the future success and enhancing the quality of student’s learning process as well as satisfying the requirements of the industry and government.

Conclusion

Thus, analyzing the course of Advanced Pharmacology and Medication Management in the BSN program of Capella University, several things have been identified. The structure and content of the course are quite relevant to the objectives of the program, allowing the students to gain all the necessary information about pharmaceuticals and their management. In the whole course, the faculty’s knowledge, assistance, and contribution has been quite good. Still, the variety of the assessments and the rate of the comments left could be more diverse and frequent respectively. In conclusion, NURS FPX 6107 Assessment 3 demonstrates that the course is beneficial in the training of nursing students in the aspect of safe and efficient medication administration. It also presents some ideas of what can be changed to make it even more beneficial for the learners.

References

Aul, K., Bagnall, L., Bumbach, M. D., Gannon, J., Shipman, S., McDaniel, A., & Keenan, G. (2021). A key to transforming a nursing curriculum: Integrating a continuous improvement simulation expansion strategy. SAGE Open Nursing, 7, 237796082199852. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960821998524

Beiranvand, S., Mohammad Khan Kermanshahi, S., Memarian, R., & Almasian, M. (2022). From clinical expert nurse to part-time clinical nursing instructor: design and evaluation of a competency-based curriculum with structured mentoring: A mixed methods study. BMC Nursing, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00797-8

Bogossian, F., & Craven, D. (2020). A review of the requirements for interprofessional education and interprofessional collaboration in accreditation and practice standards for health professionals in Australia. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 35(5), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2020.1808601

Center, R. (2020). Measuring student success: Innovative approaches to understanding diverse learners. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED603739.pdf

DelMonte, J., Murray, B., & Burke, K. (2022). Overview of the revised commission on collegiate nursing education entry-to-practice nurse residency program accreditation standards. Journal for Nurses in Professional Development, 38(3), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000893

Elshama, S. S. (2020, April 1). How to apply simulation-based learning in medical education? Papers.ssrn.com. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4097944

Flaubert, J. L., Menestrel, S. L., Williams, D. R., & Wakefield, M. K. (2021). Educating nurses for the future. In www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK573912/

Gonzalo, A. (2023, July 2). Jean Watson’s theory of human caring . Nurseslabs. https://nurseslabs.com/jean-watsons-philosophy-theory-transpersonal-caring/

Gouëdard, P., Pont, B., Hyttinen, S., & Huang, P. (2020). Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development EDU/WKP(2020)27 curriculum reform: A literature review to support effective implementation OECD Working Paper No. 239. https://one.oecd.org/document/EDU/WKP(2020)27/En/pdf

Graham, A. C., & McAleer, S. (2018). An overview of realist evaluation for simulation-based education. Advances in Simulation, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-018-0073-6

Issuu. (2022, June 26). Strategies for curriculum evaluation, supervision, and decision -making by Alyn Ruiz – Issuu. Issuu.com. https://issuu.com/solalyn/docs/strategies.docx

Japee, G., & Oza, P. (2021). Curriculum and evaluation in outcome-based education. PSYCHOLOGY and EDUCATION, 58(2), 5620–5625. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f661/d91dcd0c48bbfc41ed00a6f40d8163a722cf.pdf

Kareskoski, M. (2023). Accreditation in continuing veterinary education: development of an accreditation system and selection of accreditation criteria. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 10, 1181961. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2023.1181961

King, R., Taylor, B., Talpur, A., Jackson, C., Manley, K., Ashby, N., Tod, A., Ryan, T., Wood, E., Senek, M., & Robertson, S. (2020). Factors that optimize the impact of continuing professional development in nursing: A rapid evidence review. Nurse Education Today, 98(2), 104652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104652

Kumar, P., Shukla, B., & Passey, D. (2020). Impact of accreditation on quality and excellence of higher education institutions. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 41(2), 151–167. https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/id/eprint/141916/

Lim, L.-A., Gentili, S., Pardo, A., Kovanović, V., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., & Dawson, S. (2019). What changes, and for whom? A study of the impact of learning analytics-based process feedback in a large course. Learning and Instruction, 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.04.003

Lucander, H., & Christersson, C. (2020). Engagement for quality development in higher education: a process for quality assurance of assessment. Quality in Higher Education, 26(2), 135–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1761008

Malhotra, R., Massoudi, M., & Jindal, R. (2022). An alumni-based collaborative model to strengthen academia and industry partnership: The current challenges and strengths. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11276-1

Mebert, L., Barnes, R., Dalley, J., Gawarecki, L., Ghazi-Nezami, F., Shafer, G., Slater, J., & Yezbick, E. (2020). Fostering student engagement through a real-world, collaborative project across disciplines and institutions. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1750306

Nevenglosky, E., Cale, C., & Panesar Aguilar, S. (2019). Barriers to effective curriculum implementation. Research in Higher Education Journal, 36(36). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1203958.pdf

Oliveira, I. V., Nascimento, Y. de A., & Ramalho-de-Oliveira, D. (2020). Decision-making process in comprehensive medication management services: From the understanding to the development of a Theoretical Model. Pharmacy, 8(4), 180. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy8040180

Pérez-delHoyo, R., Mora, H., Martí-Ciriquián, P., María Luisa Pertegal-Felices, & Mollá-Sirvent, R. (2020). Introducing innovative technologies in higher education: An experience in using geographic information systems for the teaching‐learning process. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(5), 1110–1127. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22287

Queen, L. (2023). Accreditation Commission for Education in Nursing (ACEN): A mixed methods study to determine accreditation readiness at a nonprofit organization located in Western North Carolina – ProQuest. Www.proquest.com. https://search.proquest.com/openview/0beb127ee4b84f42331c0d769a311723/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Sivasubramaniam, S., Dlabolová, D. H., Kralikova, V., & Khan, Z. R. (2021). Assisting you to advance with ethics in research: an introduction to ethical governance and application procedures. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 17(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-021-00078-6

van Tuijl, A. A. C., Calsbeek, H., Wollersheim, H. C., Laan, R. F. J. M., Fluit, C. R. M. G., & van Gurp, P. J. (2019). Does a long-term quality and safety curriculum for health care professionals improve clinical practice? An evaluation of quality improvement projects. Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 40(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/ceh.0000000000000277

Vincent-Ruz, P., Meyer, T., Roe, S. G., & Schunn, C. D. (2020). Short-term and long-term effects of pogil in a large-enrollment general chemistry course. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(5), 1228–1238. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01052

Wijngaards-de Meij, L., & Merx, S. (2018). Improving curriculum alignment and achieving learning goals by making the curriculum visible. International Journal for Academic Development, 23(3), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144x.2018.1462187

Yigletu, S., Kosinski, K. C., Kuah, A., Alfaro, K., Holmes, A. C., & Tendulkar, S. A. (2021). “Collaboration Toward One Collective Goal”: A mixed-methods study of short-term learning outcomes and long-term impacts among students participating in an undergraduate community-based participatory research (CBPR) Course. Frontiers in Public Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.694840

Zhu, Y., Wang, A., Bai, Y., Xu, M., Yin, H., & Gao, Q. (2022). Construction and practice of a comprehensive nursing skills course with simulation in an RN-BSN program in China: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Medical Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02998-w

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

    Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

      Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
      Scroll to Top
      Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
      Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.