Get NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Nursing Staff Adverse Events

Ready to turn inspiration into action? Explore our services now and transform your vision into reality with our expert assistance.

Project Summary Report

NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Considering the case of this project, new challenges in terms of implications for nursing staff and healthcare providers emerge; one of these is the issue of collaboration and teamwork. The challenges can potentially influence the safety of a patient as well as the overall quality of a health facility’s service delivery. In dealing with adverse events, the team of a quality improvement project at the project site aims to address all adverse events, increase healthcare providers’ awareness, and improve care quality. The project summary report will concisely describe an innovative quality improvement project that tries to discharge practicable

Background and Organization Gap Analysis

Ensuring quality patient services is the ultimate goal for most healthcare facilities, with the communication mechanism serving as an essential component of the healthcare delivery system. Another issue is the communication between the different personnel in the ward: the nursing staff and the healthcare providers. It came to light in June 2024 after the quality department gave clearance, allowing a review of patient documents from March to May 2024. NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 analyzing twenty patient charts, the study demonstrated that the median treatment delay was at 60%, and patient near-misses and delays in medication management were also evident.

Thus, there is a need to improve relations between staff and nursing workers to facilitate efficient work that improves the quality of patient care. Reduced and efficient hand-off communication is an essential aspect of healthcare delivery. Weaknesses, including delayed specialist care, traumas like near-misses, and medication administration problems, were described as depressants of handoff effectively.

Significance of the Practice Problem

Issues of national concern, quality, and regulatory requirements call attention to the need for high-reliability handoffs for better and safer patient outcomes. Adverse events refer to the negative outcome of handoffs, which have impacts, including fatalities and medication errors. In this sense, it is possible to argue that enhancing handoff procedures may decrease such circumstances and promote the health condition of patients and the quality of healthcare delivery (Blazin et al., 2020) as it is the project site, a recognized problem is the communication handover between the nursing staff and other healthcare providers. This concern was first raised in June 2024, when the hospital’s management via the quality department permitted scrutinizing the patient charts from March to May 2023. Prospective observations of twenty patient charts reveal a disparity in treatment time of approximately sixty percent, near-miss occurrences, and medication management disruptions.

NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Essential components if Cutural Care

In some societies, essential components of cultural care comprise courtesy and assertiveness between healthcare professionals and clients (Humphrey et al., 2022). For example, in cultures sensitive to family involvement in decision-making, standardized hand-off consumers involve the family appropriately, and crucial information about the patient is conveyed (Nygaard et al., 2020). Another critical aspect of legal requirements is an increased focus on adherence to clearly defined protocols to improve the safety of the patients. The standards across the country include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), which discloses various procedures for information exchange during transitions (Edemekong et al., 2022). Policy compliance Streamlines the operation of healthcare facilities to meet the set government standards and regulations.

NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Panels to which patients are handed over are often not standardized, and this compromises ethical principles such as beneficence due to the increased risk of adverse consequences. The principle of autonomy is violated, especially when patient handoffs fail to relay essential details to the receiving cross-functional care providers (Reis-Dennis, 2020). Communication during handoffs may not be effective for some patients. Since care delivery may be contingent upon the effectiveness of such communication, patients may receive differential care, thus raising an ethical concern of equity in the delivery of healthcare services

Summary of the Evidence

Multiple research studies explain that poor handoff communication leads to adverse outcomes and patient harm. Patients are safe when standardized handoff processes are used in their care since fewer preventable adverse outcomes exist. The quantitative aspect The above citation reveals that with the increase in the use of I-PASS over 18 months, the perceived handoff error reduced, illustrating the impact of the implementation of the I-PASS tool.

Standardization creates and resets expectations of how it is permissible to communicate such important information during care transitions. NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Handoffs also should involve quality teamwork by the providers to become effective. Harris et al. (2023) implemented a warm handoff protocol to reduce interruptions during handoff communication for 153 cardiovascular surgical cases. The six-week intervention improved efficiency in patient care, and advantages have been sustained over two years (Keebler et al., 2023). Kim et al. (2020) survey supports this concept and stresses the importance of safety culture and thorough preparation of the handoff training program. It is commonly known that many patient harm events originate from communication failure. Humphrey et al. (2022) went further from the claims made for malpractice. They identified that those resulting from communication breakdowns were present in more than a third of them, noting that handoffs posed significant risks. Likewise, Pino et al. (2019) also concluded that following established handoff guidelines helps lower the error frequency. Stakeholder perspectives also suggest the same effect, pointing at the specific handoff tools as providing an improved capacity for passing useful info (Hughes et al., 2019).

Quality Improvement Framework

The “Plan” is to work to prevent such occurrences by deploying an evidence-informed handoff tool, I-PASS. This includes a literature review to understand how outcomes of adverse events have been assessed (Vanderzwan et al., 2023). NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 outcomes, in terms of a reduced number of adverse-event occurrences, will be determined by examining the direction of the change, specifically the percentage reduction of adverse events compared to the pre- and post-implementation time frame of the intervention. The “Do” phrase means strengthening the communication process among the nursing staff by enhancing their awareness of an improved evidence-based handoff technique, which is the Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) tool developed by the WHO (Adam et al., 2022). The “Study” phase also entails categorizing data collected on the occurrences classified as adverse events according to the criterion set, and the put-in-place system enables the staff to offer feedback on the novel evidence-based handoff.

NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Project Description

This project aimed to pursue the central goal of clarifying the involvement of nurses and other HC professionals in the continuity of care across different care settings. The conclusion concerned part-time and permanent carer staff, specifically first, second, and third-level carers. They are relevant tools chosen to improve communication during the hand-off process. The tools require the reinforcement of compliant methods within the standard business processes and are accompanied by monitoring, which is responsible for tracking the data regularly. Various monitoring methods for determining efficiency may be used, for example, based on the data being tracked on an ongoing basis. Engagement of the staff in the formation of input recognizes potential changes to optimize the adaptable protocols to set benchmarks within various settings and patient groups for minimization of harm through effective handoffs (Chien et al., 2022).

Discussion and Implication for Nursing and Health Care

Furthermore, the positive findings indicate that the modification may be effective in other healthcare organizations and policies; therefore, the efficiency of such change in different healthcare institutions must be institutionalized to improve the efficiency of patient care services. NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 Evaluation and execution of rules and guidelines for proper handoff must continue even after a project is completed to support the use of appropriate research-based handoff. Competency reassessments at least yearly, protocol modifications in existing staff, and new staff training on handoff will be sustainable. Since such outcomes are satisfactory initially, using standardized handoff in other departments is advisable to extend safety effects. Improving handoff practices within outpatient health clinics, which are grounded on research evidence, means there are fiscal consequences to modern healthcare organizations. A notable impact is the monetary investment in recruiting and training the number of multidisciplinary staff required to implement and monitor the guidelines of tools such as I-PASS and ISBAR. By taking the training course, the adverse event expense is reduced by not setting the upfront costs of training material, information technology, and staff time. However, more resources are needed after implementing this project to ensure the sustainability of the training and audit—leadership commitment to bottom-line gains. Modifying liability/malpractice protection is deemed necessary (Nzinga et al., 2021). Grant funding prospects can help clinics with resources and examine the factors of implementation in diverse conditions.

Summary and Conclusion

NURS FPX9904 Assessment 4 primary qualitative calculation based on the pre-post intervention analysis of rates, it was found that the overall percentage of adverse events has been reduced from the initial 60 % to significantly lower than the targeted 30% reduction. Furthermore, the experiences of the staff, as shown by satisfaction rates of surveys, revealed enhanced staff satisfaction in terms of handoff communication and perception of the new I-PASS and ISBAR algorithms. These outcomes were attained in the proposed research and can be attributed to implementing methods to decrease mishaps and improve interaction among service providers regarding patient handoffs. Future studies comparing the planned outcomes after two to three years and identifying the sustainment factors point to valuable outcomes. Handoff best practices that are research-founded have increased the occurrence of unfavorable situations.

REFERENCES

Abbaszade, A., Assarroudi, A., Armat, M. R., Stewart, J. J., Rakhshani, M. H., Sefidi, N., & Sahebkar, M. (2020). Evaluation of the impact of handoff based on the SBAR Technique on quality of nursing care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, Publish Ahead of Print (3). https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000498

Abuzied, Y., Alshammary, S. A., Alhalahlah, T., & Somduth, S. (2023). Using FOCUS-PDSA quality improvement methodology model in health care: Process and outcomes. Global Journal on Quality and Safety in Health care, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.36401/jqsh-22-19

Adam, M. H., Ali, H. A., Abubaker, K., Ibrahim, M. F., Omar, R. S., Mahmoud, D. S., Mohammed Sara, O. A., Ahmed, R. A., Habib, K. R., & Ali, D. Y. (2022). I use the Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation (SBAR) form for handoff communication in the pediatric department of Sudanese teaching.

hospital. Cureus, 14(11)https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.31998

Albassam, M., & Aslam, M. (2021). Testing internal quality control of clinical laboratory data using paired t-tests under uncertainty. BioMed Research International, 2021(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5527845

Balon, R., Guerrero, A. P. S., Coverdale, J. H., Brenner, A. M., Louie, A. K., Beresin, E. V., & Roberts, L. W. (2019). Institutional Review Board Approval as an educational tool.

Academic Psychiatry, 43(3), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01027-9

Blazin, L. J., Sitthi-Amorn, J., Hoffman, J. M., & Burlison, J. D. (2020). Improving patient Handoffs and transitions through adaptation and implementation of I-PASS across multiple

Handoff settings. Pediatric Quality & Safety, 5(4), 323. https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000323

Bukoh, M. X., & Siah, C. J. R. (2019). A systematic review and meta-analysis on the structured handover interventions in improving patient safety outcomes. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(3), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12936

Campbell, D., & Dontje, K. (2019). Implementing bedside handoff in the emergency department: A practice improvement project. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.09.007

Chien, L., Slade, D., Dahm, M. R., Brady, B., Roberts, E., Goncharov, L., Taylor, J., Eggins, S., & Thornton, A. (2022). Improving patient-centered care through a tailored intervention addressing nursing clinical handover communication in its organizational and cultural context. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15110

Edemekong, P. F., Pavan Annamaraju, & Haydel, M. J. (2022, February 3). Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act. Nih.gov; StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK500019/

Elwy, A. R., Wasan, A. D., Gillman, A. G., Johnston, K. L., Dodds, N., McFarland, C., & Greco,

M. (2020). Using formative evaluation methods to improve clinical implementation: Description and an example. Psychiatry Research, 283(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112532

Hughes, H. K., Serwint, J. R., O’Toole, J. K., Spector, N. D., & Ngo, T. L. (2019). I-PASS adherence and implications for future handoff training. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 11(3), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-18-01086.1

Humphrey, K. E., Sundberg, M., Milliren, C. E., Graham, D. A., & Landrigan, C. P. (2022). Frequency and nature of communication and handoff failures in medical malpractice claims. Journal of Patient Safety, p. 18. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000937

Keebler, J. R., Lynch, I., Ngo, F., Phelps, E., Huang, N., Guttman, O., Preble, R., Abu Taher Minhajuddin, Gamez, N., W.-H., A., L., K., M., E., G., L., M., M., A., A. P., O., D., &

Greilich, P. E. (2023). Leveraging the science of teamwork to sustain handoff improvements in cardiovascular surgery. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 49(8), 373–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2023.05.006

Kim, J. H., Lee, J. L., & Kim, E. M. (2020). Patient safety culture and handoff evaluation of nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals. International journal of nursing sciences, 8(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.007

McNicholas, C., Lennox, L., Woodcock, T., Bell, D., & Reed, J. E. (2019). Evolving quality improvement support strategies to improve Plan–Do–Study–Act cycle fidelity: A retrospective mixed-methods study. BMJ Quality & Safety, 28(5), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007605

Nygaard, A. M., Selnes H, H., Støre B, B., & Lind, R. (2020). Information concerning ICU patients’ families in the handover— The clinicians’ “game of whispers”: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15414

Nzinga, J., Boga, M., Kagwanja, N., Waithaka, D., Edwine Barasa, Tsofa, B., Gilson, L., & Molyneux, S. (2021). An innovative leadership development initiative to support building everyday resilience in health systems. Health Policy and Planning, 36(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czab056

Pino, F. A., Sam, K. J., Wood, S. L., Tafreshi, P. A., Parks, S. L., Bell, P. A., Hoffman, E. A., Koebel, L. M., St. Peter, S. D. (2019). Increasing compliance with a new interunit

Handoff process. Pediatric Quality and Safety, 4, 180. https://doi.org/10.1097/pq9.0000000000000180

Qiu, H., & Du, W. (2021). Evaluation of the effect of PDCA in hospital health management.

Journal of Health Care Engineering, 2021, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6778045

Reis-Dennis, S. (2020). Understanding autonomy: An urgent intervention. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa037

Joint Commission. (2023). Hospital: 2023 national patient safety goals. Jointcommission.org. https://www.jointcommission.org/standards/national-patient-safety-goals/hospital-

national-patient-safety-goals/

Vanderzwan, K. J., Kilroy, S., Daniels, A., & Jennifer O’Rourke. (2023). Nurse-to-nurse handoff with distractors and interruptions: An integrative review. Nurse Education in Practice, p. 67, 103550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.10355