Evaluation of Student 1: Hildegard
As for the material and the content of the material that the slides were constructed on the slides were acceptable. NURS 600 Assignment 8.1 Project Evaluation Evaluation presentation had a nice layout for the introduction slide, which offered a concise outline of the topic. The introduction is where there is a thorough outline of the subject before going over Peplau’s theories. Additionally, specific information on the biographical background of Peplau and the various methods his theories influence nursing were discussed. The personal interest of the presenter and the way in which the theories of Peplau aligned with the goal of nursing was evident.
This showed individual enthusiasm and an in-depth understanding of the subject. The various stages were highlighted and the functions nursing professionals of Peplau have the ability to fulfill. The stages and nursing tasks as defined by Peplau were discussed in detail and showed a deep understanding of the concept. Kirkpatrick evaluation of the content of the theories from Peplau with regard to nursing field and health healthcare field was described clearly as was the ability that theoretical ideas could be applied to nursing practice was also discussed (4 scores). The talk provided a thorough and thoughtful explanation of how to apply the concepts in health medical contexts. Also, it covered the core skills required for a nurse as well as the examples that in making the concepts more practical and useful.
NURS 600 Assignment 8.1 Project Evaluation
In general, I’m impressed with the way the infographic discusses the connection to discrimination. Theory Project is within the underlying Peplau’s theories, which form the foundation of three parts. The connection between health equality and discrimination is established, and is stated with greater detail and has highlighted the various elements. The attack is on the theories using a strategy that focused on of its rigor, the clarity, and effectiveness, and evaluation of the negatives as in the benefits that all three of the aspects that were previously mentioned. It was instructive, highlighting the significance of a few aspects, because they could comprehend the basics of the theories Peplau explained during the talk. A few references did not conform to APA formatting completely, which lowered overall professionalism for the class. In conclusion The author believes that when assessing the needs of the program and its educational outcome, students were able to comprehend the material taught through Peplau theory, demonstrating the importance of it to nurses as well as wrote a clean and polished paper. When they have reviewed the material of the article and looking at results, the paper scores the average of 43 to 33 out of 50.
Student 2: Brittany Brusven
Overall, it was a fantastic presentation which addressed all the aspects that comprise the rubric. The presentation, however, wasn’t perfect and had a few small lapses. The slides utilized to construct the title were adequate and the introduction was clear about the subject matter of the discussion. The biographical information sufficed for the introduction of the theory maker. The presentation gave the audience a brief outline of the background of their professional and personal life. It was a result of that they decided to use the concept of Good. The rationale behind this theory and the reason it is valid is because it’s useful to achieve the goals of personal as well as professional. The presentation on the theory was concise, but thorough. The focus was on the most important components and ideas and what the theory’s goals were.
Project Theory
The concepts were simple to grasp and bolstered by compelling explanations of how the theory was conceptualized. The author showed his knowledge of areas in which theory of Good can be located within theories of mid-range. Furthermore to that, he gave a detailed analysis of the most effective way to utilize the theories of Good alongside the other theories of mid-range theories. Three key aspects were addressed on specific elements that make up Good theory. The main tenets in the Good theory. They were explained and, in actuality, the theory established the relationship between theories and the practice. Further clarifications were offered as part of the discussions in conjunction with Good Works’ study and the findings of the study (3 conclusion).
Related Assignment: NURS 600 Assignment 7.1 Theory Outside Evaluation
The conclusion was clear that the arguments in opposition to the theories was reasonable and in accordance with the theories as well as its practicality. There were arguments in support of the theory project assignment 8.1 . Definitions as well as the features of each were discussed with examples to show how effective they are. NURS 600 Assignment 8.1 theory project presented in information graphics, which makes the details make more fascinating and valuable (2 percent ).The examples presented showed how the various components of the idea was utilized in different contexts, in addition to proving that the concept is applicable. This is why the analysis and purpose of the findings comprehensive and comprised of a detailed analysis of the concepts that can be applied to nursing.
The philosophical theory behind Janice Morse of suffering was described in a way that was easy to understand. The writer then linked this theory to the Good theory to demonstrate that they were aware of the connections between both theories. The method that the writer presented an authentic version to the story ties both theories together which allowed the implementation of the theories for three AP points. This is a wonderful example of citations but they may not have adhered to APA format as strictly as they ought to have. This might have damaged the quality of the piece. I believe that I was impressed by the way Student 2 presented an extensive and thorough examination of the theories proposed by the Dr. Good and demonstrated its importance to the field of nursing. The instructor gives an total score as 42 out of 50 points when evaluating the course’s overall performance.
Student 3: Sharon Zipporah Champion
NURS 600 Assignment 8.1 Project Evaluation will provide an exhaustive and insightful review regarding Nola J. Pender’s Health Promotion Model (HPM) and I’d like express gratitude to Sharon Zipporah Champion to provide an exhaustive and thorough critique. One of the initial points I’m able of noting is the slide that introduced the presentation, which was beneficial because it gave a concise outline of the topic that the presentation will discuss (Environmental Management). This presentation contains a complete description on Nola Pender. Most of the information comprise a brief biography, along with the accomplishments she has made and her contributions to nursing (3 three points). This presentation gave an insight into the main reason why Nola Pender’s Health Promotion Model was chosen and the relationship between her personal and professional goals.
The most important reasons was her understanding of the concept as well as her capacity to recognize the most important concepts and theories and it is that drives HPM. While watching Sharon presented, she showed how she was able to combine HPM theories with the middle range model, which examines the outcomes and the interactions between the person and their surroundings. Sharon explained the theories and the theory that underlies HPM and explained that theories of personality have their roots by a concentration on identity, as well as how self-image is important with respect to behaviors that are related to health. The presentation was instructive and depth. The talk focused on the theory with its strengths and weaknesses. Its advantages include the emphasis on the patient in Meaningful Use Criteria, while the negatives are because of the real anxiety in assessing self-esteem, as well as different abstract concepts.
NURS 600 Assignment 8.1 Project Evaluation
The most important features of the study are clear about the relationship between these two concepts in the model. Infographics are a great way to improve knowledge as well as aid in understanding the key components of the model as well as the relationship between them. The principal reasons for this is that the author provided concise examples of how theoretical concepts can be applied within the real world and also the diverse situations that were discussed are suitable for a variety of settings. Regarding the effect on practice in nursing The various elements which are a part of the notion were explained in incredible detail in order to demonstrate the significance to modern nursing practice and to demonstrate it is a an extensively employed across many nations. Sharon discussed the ways that the concept of critical race might be applied within the Pender model in addition to ways that race and the history of race could be included in this HPM model.
NURS600 Assignment 8.1 Project Evaluation is a critical connection that resulted in a greater understanding of the ways these theories about health are incorporated in. The presentation did not have a limit to the amount of time. There were references but they were not in line with APA formatting, thereby making it less professional. Presentation. (2 ). To clarify, Sharon Zipporah Champion did great job at giving the information in the rigor of a presentation that is comprehensive and precise, with concepts that were linked and clearly laid out, and also providing an extensive explanation of the concept which is Nola Pender’s Health Promotion Model and its application in nursing. It’s an honor to have the privilege of stating that during the course of giving my presentation I received an overall score of four out of four (44/50).