...

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 Benchmark and Quality Measures

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2

Ready to turn inspiration into action? Explore our Nursing Care Plan Writing Service now and transform your vision into reality with our expert assistance.

Secure Management of Myocardial Infarction Data: Compliance and Efficiency

BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 primary cardiovascular disease affecting the globe is myocardial infarction (MI) or heart attack, a condition best handled with careful documentation of clients’ details. Protecting MI data must be a priority due to the regulations and legislation that need to be followed, as well as the need to protect the patients’ information and privacy (Singh et al., 2024). This paper seeks to uncover the means, ends, and importance of secure management of MI data by considering compliance with HIPAA law, Information Life Cycle Management, standards of Interoperability and HIE integration, roles of access control, and data disposal.

BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 Criteria for Differentiating Confidentiality 

Security and privacy of patients’ information should be a priority, especially when dealing with MI data. Confidentiality mainly involves the prevention of communication, disclosure, or access to data, prevention of protection of the rights of individuals in relation to personal information, and maintenance of confidence in health facilities. In the case of MI data, there are strict privacy constraints that limit only the clinicians from accessing patients’ information and not any other person. This includes the following measures: User authentication and role-based permission, limiting the EHR system access only to the qualified healthcare professionals involved in the patient’s care (Fillmore et al., 2023).

Protecting Patient Informaation

 Whereas security coupling is a set of broader strategies for protecting patient information from cyber threats, breaches, vulnerabilities, and more. Technical measures protecting the MI data include ensuring that data is encrypted when being transferred from one location to the other, conducting audits from time to time to check on the vulnerabilities within the system, and preventing malicious software from attacking the system and hence affecting the patient’s data. Also, physical controls like limiting physical access to the IT server rooms and proper disposal and destruction of physical records contribute to the high-security status of the healthcare organization (Alipour et al., 2023).

 In the environment of HIPAA, which regulates the confidentiality and privacy of PHI, confidentiality and security issues are the key to compliance. According to the HIPAA, administrative, physical, and technical measures have to be put in place so that the PHI can be protected and patient data cannot be disclosed to unauthorized people at any stage in its lifecycle. Hence, in handling MI data, healthcare organizations have to follow HIPAA rules and standards of confidentiality and security relevant to cardiovascular health information’s needs and threats (Tovino, 2023). In order to assess the following risk, we provide a risk assessment of the current and BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 foreseen vulnerability exposures, HIPAA policies, staff training, and constant audit of data access and usage to ensure HIPAA compliance.

Compliance with Health Information Laws and Regulations for Managing MI Data

As was established in the previous sections, the management of health information, particularly MI-related data in the United States, involves compliance with laws and regulations other than HIPAA. They involve the subsequent legal frameworks seeking to protect, maintain, and ethically and legally manage patient information, as well as privacy and security. BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 vital legislation that applies to HIM is the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act (HHS, 2021). This act builds the HIPAA provisions by expanding the regulatory scope of those requirements, enhancing the penalties for non-adherence, supporting the use of EHRs to improve data security further, and reversing the execution of the previously implemented meaningful use policies.

 Also, federal and state laws regulate the privacy and security of health information within a healthcare organization, and these laws differ with the states. For instance, most states have implemented their respective data breach notification laws under which MI data holders among healthcare providers are required to notify the affected patients of the breach of their information (Prictor, 2023). However, the recent CMS regulations, particularly the QPP and Value-based care, bring standards for reporting quality measures and patient outcomes (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, n. d. ). Adherence to these regulations may require the gathering and evaluation of MI data with the intention of evaluating the quality of care in physician groups.

BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2

Given this array of conflicting rules, physician groups need policies and procedures that can help accommodate all aspects of confidentiality, privacy, and security regarding MI data management. They should describe the allowed uses of patients’ information, and the procedure for gaining consent from patients, as well as define the security measures regarding data transfer and storage. Moreover, healthcare organizations must spend on staff training and education regarding their legal remit concerning MI data. It is recommended that organizations should make assessments and audits periodically so that violations of the law and legal gaps can be checked (Tovino, 2023).

Evaluation Criteria for Information Systems in Data Management

To choose the best information system(s) for managing MI data, the following factors have to be given due consideration so as to make the retrieval and analysis of patient information easy and quick without compromising the security and confidentiality of the data. First of all, CPOE must be compatible with EHR systems, acting as both a front-end or user interface to EHR systems and a stand-alone system. Due to the fact that EHRs constitute the core information system in various healthcare organizations’ patient data, any information system chosen must, therefore, work in tandem with existing EHR systems. BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 integration allows the access of complete records of a patient that contain notes, diagnoses, and treatments that are useful in reviewing the quality of care offered on MI (Azadi & Peñalvo, 2023). Secondly, Introducing ‘Cross-System Functional Capabilities’ for interoperability between operating systems is necessary. The showcased information system(s) should also meet the interoperability standards that will allow for the exchange of MI data between different healthcare facilities like hospitals, clinics, and laboratories. This integration also guarantees the continuity of patients’ treatment and Records of their health history for research and other improvement activities (Gupta et al., 2023).

BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 Choice Access Point

 Secondly, the companies must consider issues such as access and ease of use. The chosen system(s) should be easily operable with easy-to-understand interfaces by which healthcare providers can search for and extract their MI data easily. The system(s) should, in addition, have choice access points such as web-based interfaces or mobile apps for purposes of catering to the variability in the needs of healthcare professionals. In addition, the security of data aspects is inviolable. Due to the BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 confidentiality of MI data, proper security measures have to be put in place in the selected information system(s) to ensure that patient record confidentiality is maintained at the highest level. This includes cryptographic solid safeguards and mechanisms, access control(role-based), and data tracking and reporting mechanisms to ensure that it records who has accessed and modified the data (Singh et al., 2023).

 Also important is the scalability and the level of customization the software offers. The selected system should also be expandable enough to accommodate a large volume of MI data and flexible enough to adapt to the new needs of developing healthcare organizations. Adaptation features mean that organizations can configure the system(s) to their requirements and personal preferences to provide better ease of use and productivity (Singh et al., 2023).

Efficient Procedures for Managing the Information Life Cycle

There are various procedures to deal with the information life cycle of the MI data and patient information, in particular from the time they are collected to the time they are disposed of. Firstly, the inherent procedure of collection should also incorporate principles regarding the collection of MI data that might be utilized through the patient’s interaction, including history and physical assessment, laboratory and other diagnostic testing, and therapeutic plan formulation. This data should be documented as soon as possible and done by qualified staff in the healthcare facility using templates in the EHR system (Owolabi, 2024). BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 MI data documentation procedures should be appropriately aligned with regard to the interoperability standards so as to support the smooth transmission of MI data from one healthcare system and a healthcare provider to the other. This entails the use of research-based coding systems and terminologies, including SNOMED CT and LOINC, that are compatible with interoperability Health Information Exchange (HIE) networks (Dixon, 2023).

HIC Network Facilitates

 Membership within the HIE network facilitates the possibility of securely transmitting MI data to other members of the e-Health system, which takes part in the treatment of the patient. HIE integration procedures should focus on the secure integration of new systems and the definition of the necessary parameters for the exchange of information. Methods for storing data should also be safe and convenient; all the MI data should be saved in encrypted form within the secure, duplicate storage systems. There should be privacy controls to allow only authorized personnel to access patient information. When BHA FPX 4106 Assessment 2 is implemented, user credentials and proper authorization in the form of roles should be in place. Among the solutions to be implemented in the control of access procedures, there ought to be obligatory control and analysis of user activities aimed at identifying cases of unauthorized access to MI data or their misuse (Abbas et al., 2021). It is well recommended that access logs be kept so as to monitor data access and changes, and penalties be provided for policy infringement.

 Last but not least, data disposal should also be standardized to allow proper disposal of MI data when such data will no longer be needed for patient treatment or in cases where they cannot be used in any court of law. This may require tearing paper documents that have the patient’s information and removing the electronic records through cleansing (Abbas et al., 2021).

Conclusion

  Finally, when BHA FPX 4106 assessment 2 considering the guidelines for handling MI data, it is essential to ensure that the data complies with legal requirements such as HIPAA and other state laws. It is possible to manage, control, and destroy MI data through sound policies/procedures, proper selection of information systems, compatibility, and interface with HIEs while maintaining the privacy of patients and their data security.

References

 Abbas, A., Alroobaea, R., Krichen, M., Rubaiee, S., Vimal, S., & Almansour, F. M. (2021). Blockchain-assisted secured data management framework for health information analysis based on the Internet of Medical Things. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 28, 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01583-8

Alipour, J., Mehdipour, Y., Karimi, A., Khorashadizadeh, M., & Akbarpour, M. (2023). Security, confidentiality, privacy and patient safety in the hospital information systems from the users’ perspective: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105066

Azadi, A., & Peñalvo, F. (2023). Synergistic effect of medical information systems integration: To what extent will it affect the accuracy level in the reports and decision-making systems? Informatics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010012

CMS.gov. (n.d.). QPP Overview – QPP. Qpp.cms.gov. https://qpp.cms.gov/about/qpp-overview

Dixon, B. E. (2023). Chapter 1 – Introduction to health information exchange. In B. E. Dixon (Ed.), ScienceDirect (pp. 3–20). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780323908023000137

Fillmore, A. R., McKinley, C. D., & Tallman, E. F. (2023). Chapter 6 – Managing privacy, confidentiality, and risk: Towards trust. In B. E. Dixon (Ed.), ScienceDirect (pp. 131–147). Academic Press. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780323908023000307

Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., & Kumar Panigrahi, P. (2023). Analysis of security and privacy issues of information management of big data in B2B-based healthcare systems. Journal of Business Research, 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113859

HHS. (2021). HITECH Act Enforcement Interim Final Rule. HHS.gov. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/special-topics/hitech-act-enforcement-interim-final-rule/index.html

Owolabi, R. (2024). Reviewing healthcare financial management: Strategies for cost-effective care. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 958–966. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0523

Proctor, M. (2023). Data breach notification laws—Momentum across the Asia-Pacific region. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Forum for Ethical and Legal Debate, 20, 567–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10324-w

Singh, K., Li, S., Jahnke, I., Alarcon, M. L., Mosa, A., & Calyam, P. (2023). Improving big data governance in healthcare institutions: User experience research for honest broker based application to access healthcare big data. Behavior & Information Technology, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2023.2196596

Singh, M., Momah, D., Palaniappan, D., Nadig, V., & Mah, J. W. (2024). Therapeutic dilemma: Acute myocardial infarction in a patient with traumatic hepatic and mesenteric injuries: A case report. A&a Practice, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1213/XAA.0000000000001741

Tovino, S. A. (2023). Patient privacy and health information confidentiality in the United States of America. Edward Elgar Publishing EBooks, 241–270. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035309436.00015

    Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

    Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading
    Please Fill The Following to Resume Reading

      Please enter correct phone number and email address to receive OTP on your phone & email.

      Verification is necessary to avoid bots.
      Scroll to Top
      Seraphinite AcceleratorOptimized by Seraphinite Accelerator
      Turns on site high speed to be attractive for people and search engines.