Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
NURS fpx4030 Assessment 2 Evidence based practices improves treatment quality, and clinical outcomes. The development of specific procedures and protocols increases the chances of attaining a favorable outcome. Recently, there has been an increase in positive outcomes for the treatment of sepsis, a complex and often fatal condition. Nonetheless, sepsis remains a significant contributor to mortality rates in hospitals. (Johnson, 2021) The selection of these materials is fundamental in carrying out the evidence-based approach because it guarantees the safety of the patients. This congress wants to identify an important issue of using evidence based approach and evaluate the credibility of the sources that were cited.
Criteria to Determine Credibility
Liberating the synthesis of falsities and truths from the web consideria requires evaluating the credibility of digital sources. Since the Internet came into existence, the way information is consumed has dramatically changed. At the same time, it has created gaps in the credibility and type of information people choose to trust. People have many sources of information available to them, and they are responsible for the accuracy of each of those sources. (Breakstone et al., 2022) Examples of these pseudoscience is the information has to be accurate and relevant to the study at hand.
NURS fpx4030 Assessment 2 Credibility of Evidence and Resources
Moreover, the author and publication have to be an accepted authority in the research topic. Authors should cite clear, concise, and objective materials. The web sources should have a domain and a design that suggests they can be trusted. As well as the various frameworks to evaluate the credibility of sources, either well known or newly crafted, such as the American version of ABCs of website assessment, CRAAP Test, DIG Method, RADAR method, SIFT Method, and the Proactive Evaluation strategy of the Project Information Literacy Team, which can be adapted for use to assess numerous documents. (Sye & Thompson, 2023)
Analyzing the Credibility and Relevance of Evidence and Resources
The “Sepsis Guidelines” article in The New England Journal of Medicine is thought to be credible as a research publication. NURS fpx4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources study utilized the Capella University library Database Summon, CINAHL, and EBSCO Host to conduct research. The piece gives an assessment of sepsis and septic shock, i.e. the two most critical medical conditions. The journalists writing these texts are clinically trained, in the field experts have evaluated the relevance and credibility of the material, it was published less than five years ago, and it is highly referenced and studied. The text discusses issues surrounding the current medical treatment, and modern scientific discoveries related to the ailments along with future prospective treatment possibilities for sepsis. This study examines the bolus administration of antibiotics and 30 ml/kg of water over three hours. It is suggested that the first treatment bundle is completed within one hour to reduce the mortality rate. (Chen et al., 2019)
Evidenced Based Model
Because of the changes in the world, nurses have to blend evidence-based practices (EBP) into their professionalism, to make use of the research done. While this is a long and tedious process, critical thinking skills will allow successful integration to take place. Both nurses and interprofessional teams have to practice EBP for the benefit of patients and the work setting. They must know what can impede the successful integration of research evidence into practice. (Speroni et al., 2020) One of the evidence-based models is the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice. It is focused on an organizational process and consists of the following seven steps: identification of a problem; collection of data; determination of the validity of the data; integration of the data with professional and patient care; institutionalization of change; assessment of the change; and communication of the results. This model allows you to know where you are, where you are going, and in what direction, you are progressing. It assists in refocusing one’s self when one strays too far from the path.
NURS fpx4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources
It aids in determining some of the challenges and risks we may face, as well as how to manage them. (Duff et al., 2020) The Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice is useful in the effective integration of the core elements of the CDC’s Hospital Sepsis Program in a healthcare institution, or even in an entire health care system. This includes hospital management providing the necessary funding, an interprofessional group for the identification, monitoring, and reporting of sepsis, and the education of health workers, patients, families, and other caregivers. The foundational components of the CDC are predetermined in the appropriate scope for flexibility, which gives hospitals the opportunity to select the more appropriate elements of the facets that will make sepsis treatment more effective and efficient. The report delineates successful enhancements of the quality of treatment and management of sepsis in the hospitals across the life span from the pre-natal, postpartum, pediatric and adult care and offers advice to those hospitals that do not have such a program or have limited resources to initiate such programs. (“CDC Identifies Core Elements for Hospital Sepsis Programs,” 2023)
Conclusion
By NURS fpx4030 Assessment 2 Determining the Credibility of Evidence and Resources you are able to improve patient results by applying practiced evidence as a nurse with a bachelor’s degree. When nurses conduct such practice, they will judge the credibility of the sources available to them, which will lead to saving time and effort in diagnosing the best course of action for their patients. Credibility assessment techniques like the Iowa Model of Evidence Based Practice may help us understand some of the risks and hurdles that we need to know about and how we will deal with them. It is essential that in addition to the clinical know-how, patient specific needs, and conducting the study while only using credible publications and peer-reviewed documents through data collection, employing evidence-based practice models, the nurse must determine whether an inquiry for a search is credible enough for the information to be practiced in patient-centered care.
References
Breakstone, J., Smith, M., Ziv, N., & Wineburg, S. (2022). Civic preparation for the digital age: How college students evaluate online sources about social and political issues. The Journal of Higher Education, 93(7), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2022.2082783
Cdc identifies core elements for hospital sepsis programs. (2023). AJN, American Journal of Nursing, 123(12), 11–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.naj.0000997176.62217.0e
Chen, A. X., Simpson, S. Q., & Pallin, D. J. (2019). Sepsis guidelines. New England Journal of Medicine, 380(14), 1369–1371. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmclde1815472
Duff, J., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., & Steelman, V. (2020). Determinants of an evidence-based practice environment: An interpretive description. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00070-0
Johnson, A. (2021). Better safe than sepsis. American Nurse Journal, 16(4), 50–54.
Speroni, K., McLaughlin, M., & Friesen, M. (2020). Use of evidence‐based practice models and research findings in magnet‐designated hospitals across the united states: National survey results. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 17(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12428
Sye, D., & Thompson, D. (2023). Tools, tests, and checklists: The evolution and future of source evaluation frameworks. Journal of New Librarianship, 8(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.33011/newlibs/13/9