Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities
In NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Outcome Measures, Issues, and Opportunities are very important in the healthcare field because they show how good and useful treatments are. They help people make decisions based on facts by telling them useful things about how patients did and how well drugs worked. Boehm et al. (2021) say they should be the same and useful in all fields, and data security issues should be fixed. As time goes on, more and more rules and steps make it harder to care for someone who has fallen. The main point of this report is to tell the people in charge about this.
Organizations’ Functions Processes and Knowledge Gaps
A lot of patients at our healthcare company fall, so we’re looking closely at the roles, processes, and habits that help us handle this well. Companies look at risks and figure out how to stop them. This is one of the most important things they do. Our healthcare workers check in on their patients often to see how well they are doing. They are also trained in safety methods and keep up with new ones that have been shown to keep people from falling. This makes people want to keep learning and changing things so that patient safety and care are always getting better (Conca et al., 2018).
People in our group also don’t fall as often because we use technology a lot. NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Tracking tools in our hospital keep an eye on how patients move and let staff know right away if there is a chance that a patient might fall. If we know this in real-time, bad things can’t last for long. People who work together are a big part of businesses that do well. Everyone on our health care teams works well together because they know their job is to keep people from falling. Doctors, nurses, PTs, and other staff share what they know and work together to make sure patients are safer (Devik et al., 2018).
To take the business to new heights, you need to be a good boss. People who work for us want to make sure that people are safe, promote open conversation, and recognize hard work. People who are given more authority are more likely to take responsibility for their mistakes and help find and fix any places where people could fall (Lane-Fall et al., 2018).
Organizational Functions, Processes, and Behaviors Support the Outcomes Measures
The most important thing for our healthcare business is to keep people from falling. Also, everyone on our team works well together to make sure no one falls. Everyone on the team works toward this goal, from the doctors and nurses to the trainers and people who clean up after the team. They can use individual treatments and tried-and-true methods that have been shown to work, which has been very good at lowering patient crashes. In just one year, the number of falls has gone down by 30%, according to a new study. (Peñataro‐Pintado et al., 2020).
Typical Quality and Safety Outcomes
The best way to stop patient falls in a healthcare setting is to do a few things that make the whole patient safer, stop falls, and cut down on accidents. In every 1,000 doctor days, how many people trip and fall is the fall rate. This is one of the most important high-quality items. Some people don’t fall as often, which is better for them and safer. Another important way to see how bad falls are and how the system could be improved is to look at how many people break bones or get other injuries when they fall. What you should think about when it comes to safety is the response time to falls. NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 One way to tell is by how long it takes for people to find someone who has fallen. There is a quick fall safety gadget that works better and faster if the reaction time is faster. (Martín-Noguerol et al., 2020).Top of Form
Evaluation of Data
To figure out the quality of the material, you have to look at how right, full, and reliable it is. To do this, statistical methods like inter-rater dependability can be used to check how consistently different healthcare professionals report falls.
Identification of Performance Issues or Opportunities
A study from the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (Granel et al., 2020) found that 6% more patients could fall if there weren’t enough nurses on staff. According to Peñataro‐Pintado et al. (2020), healthcare companies need to spend a lot of money on staffing to make sure they have enough skilled workers to keep an eye on patients who need help and help them right away. People also fall because there aren’t enough services that teach them how to stay safe. That being said, it can be hard to teach both patients and staff how to stay safe and figure out which patients are most likely to fall.
Change Model to Improve Care and Quality Issues
Many people know that Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model is a good way to handle change in an organization because it helps you make changes and keep them going in a planned way. NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Health care groups that want to deal with the problem of people falling will find this plan very useful. To get people to move quickly, Galli (2019) says that a lot of data about patient falls needs to be looked at and shared with everyone who needs to know to stress how serious the problem is. As long as the staff has the right tools and training, they can use fall avoidance methods that have been shown to work (Bousquet et al., 2019). People are more likely to work hard when they celebrate short-term wins (Carman et al., 2019). Long-term gains are kept up by building on wins and making changes part of the company culture (Bousquet et al., 2019). Health care groups can improve patient care by talking to each other and working together better and always putting patient safety first when they do these steps together.
NURS FPX 6212 Assessment 3 Opportunities for Inter-professional Collaboration
The above method gives different types of professionals a number of chances to work together to solve the problem of patients falling. A group of people from different fields may work together to look at statistics on patient falls, share information, and come up with a plan for change. With the help of nurses, doctors, therapists, managers, and patient advocates, creating and adopting fall prevention programs based on evidence lets people share ideas and the best ways to do things. It also helps build on the progress that has been made by constantly trying to get better. This kind of working together will help the company build a mindset of safety and make patient care better (Boehm et al., 2021).
Conclusion
Health care must use outcome measures to make sure that people get good care. Plans for change like Kotter’s 8-Step method can help you find and fix big problems like patients falling. A lot of work will be done. Teams from different areas of healthcare can share knowledge, use their own skills, and work together to make people safer, improve care, and get everyone better, safer, and disease-free in the long run. They are good people because of this approach.
References
Boehm, L. M., Lauderdale, J., Garrett, A. N., & Piras, S. E. (2021). A multisite study of multidisciplinary ICU team member beliefs toward early mobility. Heart & Lung: The Journal of Cardiopulmonary and Acute Care, 50(1), 214–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.09.021
Bousquet, J., Hellings, P. W., Agache, I., Amat, F., Annesi-Maesano, I., Ansotegui, I. J., Anto, J. M., Bachert, C., Bateman, E. D., Bedbrook, A., Bennoor, K., Bewick, M., Bindslev-Jensen, C., Bosnic-Anticevich, S., Bosse, I., Brozek, J., Brussino, L., Canonica, G. W., Cardona, V., & Casale, T. (2019). Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Phase 4 (2018): Change management in allergic rhinitis and asthma multimorbidity using mobile technology. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 143(3), 864–879.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2018.08.049
Carman, A. L., Vanderpool, R. C., Stradtman, L. R., & Edmiston, E. A. (2019). A change-management approach to closing care gaps in a federally qualified health center: A rural Kentucky case study. Preventing Chronic Disease, 16(E105). NCBI. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180589
Choi, J., Carlos, G., Nassar, A. K., Knowlton, L. M., & Spain, D. A. (2020). The impact of trauma systems on patient outcomes. Current Problems in Surgery, 58(1), 100849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpsurg.2020.100849
Conca, T., Saint-Pierre, C., Herskovic, V., Sepúlveda, M., Capurro, D., Prieto, F., & Fernandez-Llatas, C. (2018). Multidisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care: Analysis using process mining. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(4), e127.
https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8884
Devik, S. A., Olsen, R. M., Fiskvik, I. L., Halbostad, T., Lassen, T., Kuzina, N., & Enmarker, I. (2018). Variations in drug-related problems detected by multidisciplinary teams in Norwegian nursing homes and home nursing care. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 36(3), 291–299.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1499581
Galli, B. J. (2019). An engineering manager’s guide for commonly used change management approaches—From one practitioner’s experience. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 47(3), 118–126.
https://doi.org/10.1109/emr.2019.2896301
Granel, N., Manresa-Domínguez, J. M., Watson, C. E., Gómez-Ibáñez, R., & Bernabeu-Tamayo, M. D. (2020). Nurses’ perceptions of patient safety culture: A mixed-methods study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05441-w
Lane-Fall, M. B., Pascual, J. L., Massa, S., Collard, M. L., Peifer, H. G., Di Taranti, L. J., Linehan, M., Fleisher, L. A., & Barg, F. K. (2018). Developing a standard handoff process for operating room–to-icu transitions: Multidisciplinary clinician perspectives from the handoffs and transitions in critical care (HATRICC) study. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 44(9), 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.02.004
Martín-Noguerol, T., Paulano-Godino, F., López-Ortega, R., Górriz, J. M., Riascos, R. F., & Luna, A. (2020). Artificial intelligence in radiology: Relevance of collaborative work between radiologists and engineers for building a multidisciplinary team. Clinical Radiology.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2020.11.113
Peñataro‐Pintado, E., Rodríguez, E., Castillo, J., Martín‐Ferreres, M. L., De Juan, M. Á., & Díaz Agea, J. L. (2020). Perioperative nurses’ experiences in relation to surgical patient safety: A qualitative study. Nursing Inquiry, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.12390
Shamash, J., Ansell, W., Alifrangis, C., Thomas, B., Wilson, P., Stoneham, S., Mazhar, D., Warren, A., Barrett, T., Alexander, S., Rudman, S., Lockley, M., Berney, D., & Sahdev, A. (2021). The impact of a supranetwork multidisciplinary team (SMDT) on decision-making in testicular cancers: a 10-year overview of the Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (AGCCCG). British Journal of Cancer, 124(2), 368–374.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01075-1
Stellman, J. M., Rau, S., & Thaker, P. (2021). Occupational safety and health management. HANDBOOK of HUMAN FACTORS and ERGONOMICS, 573–596.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119636113.ch21
Tehrani, B., Truesdell, A., Singh, R., Murphy, C., & Saulino, P. (2018). Implementation of a cardiogenic shock team and clinical outcomes (INOVA-SHOCK Registry): Observational and retrospective study. JMIR Research Protocols, 7(6), e160. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9761