NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 Stakeholder Meeting

Assumptions fundamental the assembly motivation are that the healthcare suppliers do not know how to coordinated healthcare with innovation and are not capable in setting up the connection between the information to foresee the patterns of healthcare abberations in the particular understanding populace (Aguirre et al., 2019). Thus the instruction of the healthcare suppliers will be done through conferences and sessions.

New Innovation to Improve Quiet Results and Organizational Effectiveness

The presentation of the EHR framework will point to making strides in understanding well-being results by giving patient-centered, secure, and quality care. Moved forward quiet fulfillment and diminished readmission rates will lead to the forward social, monetary, and financial standing of Vila Wellbeing.

Goals of the Plan

The Shrewd (Particular, quantifiable, achievable, pertinent, and time-bound) objectives of the arrangement incorporate the following

After 30 days of executing the EHR framework (time-bound), there will be a decrease in medicine blunder rate and 30-day readmission rates of patients (particular, quantifiable).

The quality and security of the care given to the patients will increase (achievable, important) due to the built caution and alert framework in the EHR framework. It will anticipate antagonistic occasions and near-miss occasions (particular, quantifiable).

The quiet fulfillment rate will increment (achievable) as cost-effective, patient-centered, and secure healthcare administrations will be given (particular, measurable).

Capabilities of Technology

EHR framework is essentially competent in tending to the basic results of the motivation. NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 Stakeholder Meeting framework can give quality and secure care based on the built overhauled Counterfeit Insights framework that evaluates and assesses the sort of interaction fairly by analyzing the patient’s therapeutic history and displaying condition/ endorsed drugs. The EHR framework can analyze the information patterns and foresee the healthcare aberrations in the quiet populace. Along with this, the alert framework is delicate to antagonistic occasions or crises that may happen. In this way, it can avoid hurting the persistent by starting an arrangement of notices cautioning the healthcare suppliers. This way, the innovation points to an increment in the quality and security that is advertised to the patients (Adane et al., 2019).

Criteria for Assessing Organizational Viability

The PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle can be utilized to assess the adequacy of the EHR framework in the organization. The information can be analyzed through the EHR framework to evaluate and assess the decrease in medicine blunders, unfavorable occasions, near-miss occasions, quiet readmission rates, and a diminish in the mortality and dreariness rates of the patients. The information will show the EHR system’s viability, the healthcare providers’ capacity to utilize the innovation successfully, coordinated healthcare administrations with it, and the well-being benefits given to the patients. If information veers off from the anticipated comes about, changes will be made to move forward the viability of the EHR framework. It points to progress in organizational viability by making the EHR framework simple for healthcare suppliers (McNicholas et al., 2019).

Quality of Existing Data

The quality of existing information was altogether destitute compared to the information from utilizing modern innovation. The existing information appears to be an expanded frequency of medicine blunders due to misdiagnosis, unintelligible penmanship of the healthcare suppliers, and organization of off-base medicine due to apportioning mistakes or organization blunders. The information appears expanded rates of 30-day readmission rates for patients due to disgraceful rules. Miscommunication and the need for collaboration among healthcare suppliers are driven by the destitute arrangements of care for the patients due to the patient’s failure to get it and comply with the medicine. Along with this, there was an increment in quiet disappointment as mortality and dismalness rates expanded. The information appeared to indicate destitute quiet well-being, which resulted in a decrease in the hospital’s money-related standing.

Patient Privately and Security Concerns

Security Concerns

Patient security concerns that will be raised incorporate the security and privacy of understanding data. NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 Stakeholder Meeting patients will address whether their data will be shielded from burglary and undesirable introduction due to the presentation of the EHR framework. Security concerns such as abuse, character burglary, and imitation obstruct the patient’s secrecy and protection (Basil et al., 2022).

Allay the Concerns

The concerns will be addressed through VPNs (Virtual Private Systems), twofold confirmation frameworks, and authorization to be allowed through authorized people as they were. The protection and secrecy concerns will be tended to by sanctioning the rules of HIPAA (Wellbeing Protections Compactness and Responsibility Act) and HITECH (Wellbeing Data Innovation for Financial and Clinical Wellbeing Act). These rules will give a premise for the assurance of persistent data. They will guarantee that anybody who damages these rules is penalized with overwhelming fines beginning from around 51,000 dollars and extending up to a million dollars with life detainment. The EHR framework employs particular coding for exchanging persistent information, which makes a difference in anticipating encryption and, in this way, shields understanding of data. It contributes to the offering point of the EHR framework (Rosenbloom et al., 2019).

Knowledge Gaps

The need of capacity of healthcare suppliers to utilize strategies to anticipate the patient’s data from robbery can lead to exceptional results for the patients. The EHR system’s get to to all people in the healthcare setup contributes to security and privacy dangers which imperil the patient’s touchy data.

NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 Patient Confidentiality and Privacy

Telehealth must be explained to the patients on how their data will be used, and the organizations must get consent from them before engaging in such services. This includes informing subjects on how and when data will be collected, the time period for data storage, and the possibility of the data being accessed by third parties (Smith et al., 2019). Also, patients should be able to easily access privacy policies, and there must be procedures for the patient to change their consent for further use of their data (Jones & Lee, 2020). However, there might be some uncertainties and unknown areas after these measures have been taken: For example, there might be difficulties when interpreting new risks in the sphere of security and their incorporation into technologies provided by organizations. There could also be question marks over the best current end-to-end encrypted and authenticated technologies to counter the new wave of cybercrimes.

Steps and Timeline Needed

Implementation of new or advanced telehealth technology is a process that is systematic and has a timeline plan to be followed. The first phase, which is the Assessment and Planning phase, takes about 2-4 weeks and entails the assessment of current technology and the integration needs, as well as clarifying the project objectives and goals. At this stage, meetings with the stakeholders are vital to collect requirements and build a finer project plan if key stakeholders are reachable and the information regarding the technologies is available (Jones & Lee, 2020). The third step that follows is called Vendor Selection and Procurement, and this usually takes 3- 6 weeks. This phase comprises the following; preparing and disbursement of the RFP, vendor response evaluation, contract formulation, and procurement closing. NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 specific assumptions for this stage are a timely response from the vendors and a locked-down budget (Smith et al., 2019). After procurement, the stage of System Configuration and Customization takes 4-8 weeks. This entails developing the telehealth platform to meet the needs of an organization and how it can be incorporated into an organization’s infrastructure. Such include; the technology integration assumption, which assumes that there will be no bumps to hurdle, and the customization assumption, which assumes that it is well understood.

Conclusion

It can, therefore, be argued that the adoption of new or upgraded telehealth technology, for instance, the MedConnect Telehealth Platform, depends on a properly designed stakeholder engagement plan and proper planning. Such requirements include clinical and IT personnel, organizational managers and leaders, and patients, which let the technology meet various needs and gain support. The highlighted processes – initial evaluation and planning, implementation, and, finally, evaluation after implementation are aimed at meeting both technical and organizational concerns for the smoothened integration of the technological tool into the environment.

NURS FPX 6214 Assessment 2 Stakeholder management by using communication strategies is very vital when it comes to engaging stakeholders for the adoption of change. The meeting announcement, including the agenda, should identify the goal of the meeting, the advantages of the technology, and the expected results, which will assist in managing stakeholders’ expectations and enhance their participation. Explaining how telehealth technology will improve the quality of patient care and operational efficiency of the healthcare organization should also be a central part of the presentation and outline the best practices for its implementation. Another consideration is Confidentiality and Privacy, which is paramount, coupled with guaranteeing all the stakeholders that patient data is safe.

References

Ecarnot, F., Crepaldi, G., Juvin, P., Grabenstein, J., Del Giudice, G., Tan, L., O’Dwyer, S., Esposito, S., Bosch, X., Gavazzi, G., Papastergiou, J., Gaillat, J., Johnson, R., Fonzo, M., Rossanese, A., Suitner, C., Barratt, J., di Pasquale, A., Maggi, S., & Michel, J.-P. (2019). BMC Public Health, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8044-y

Franco-Trigo, L., Fernández-Llimós, F., Martínez-Martínez, F., Benrimoj, S. I., & Sabater-Hernández, D. (2020). Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review. Health Policy, 124(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.06.012

Masefield, S. C., Msosa, A., & Grugel, J. (2020). BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-06002-x

Nilsen, E. R., Stendal, K., & Gullslett, M. K. (2020). Implementation of eHealth technology in community health care: The complexity of stakeholder involvement. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05287-2

Pereno, A., & Eriksson, D. (2020). A multi-stakeholder perspective on sustainable healthcare: From 2030 onwards. Futures, 122(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2020.102605

Petkovic, J., Riddle, A., Akl, E. A., Khabsa, J., Lytvyn, L., Atwere, P., Campbell, P., Chalkidou, K., Chang, S. M., Crowe, S., Dans, L., Jardali, F. E., Ghersi, D., Graham, I. D., Grant, S., Smith, R. G., Guise, J.-M., Hazlewood, G., Jull, J., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2020). Systematic Reviews, 9(21), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-1272-5

Turner, K. M., Rousseau, N., Croot, L., Duncan, E., Yardley, L., O’Cathain, A., & Hoddinott, P. (2019). BMJ Open, 9(5), e028756. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028756