Quality Improvement Presentation Poster
Good to see you, everyone. My name is XYZ, and I will now be showing the control of type 2 diabetes. The world has a chronic ailment called diabetes, which affects millions of people around the world. Type-2 Diabetes (DM) is a predominant form found among people and can cause different health conditions without proper treatment. Quality improvement (QI) is a systematized and methodological process to depict, examine, and improve the quality of healthcare products and results. The aim is to appraise and recommend improving care delivery to patients accordingly. This should be done to maximize the patient’s safety and satisfaction and be efficient and effective. QI listens to patient feedback actively to enhance patient safety, promote quality of care, and improve the patient experience. NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster: The poster presentation will investigate the crucial role played by the Quality improvement methodology in managing type 2 diabetes and its complications in renal failure. Our session will discuss the multimodal methods of quality improvement suited for different patient populations, which will lead to improved outcomes and equal quality care for the patients.
Quality Improvement (QI) Method
Getting patient engagement quality improvement methods can be applied to address issues that are related to Type II diabetes and its other complications like Renal Failure. An example of such a technique is just a standardized documentation of medication reconciliation. The reconciliation process implies matching the patients’ medication orders to all their medications, supplementing irregularities, and updating them accordingly. Implementing this process regularly can eliminate human mistakes guarantee better patient safety, and the best results.
Another quality improvement approach is customer education on medication management, which can also be used to educate patients. This will contribute to better health outcomes. Educating patients on why it is essential to take the medications as directed by the health care provider and the basic skills in managing this medication status could let patients cope better with the condition, thus helping them improve their health and well-being. Multiple effective patient education methods exist, from individual consultations with healthcare providers to group information sessions, brochures, and booklets. By enabling people to sustain everyday living with their disease and facilitating them to make sound health decisions, patients can become competent in their disease management processes.(Galletta et al., 2022).
PDCA cycle (i.e.,p, d, c, and a) is an indispensable quality improvement strategy applied to health care, and the process consists of continuous improvement. In the first stage, the team is involved in the Planning stage. Consequently, this includes identifying the problem, setting the plans’ objectives within the program’s framework, and developing the strategy to attain the goals. The Do phase is when the process is underway, and data collection is an essential activity to determine if it has the intended impact. NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster: Throughout the phase of Check, the measurement data will be checked to ensure that the plan during the Do phase attains its purpose. In the Check phase, the team could gather and analyze information about Mrs. Smith and check her medication adherence and blood sugar levels to see if the interventions were successful. According to the data, the officials can make a few changes at the Act stage, such as improving the medication reconciliation process or, for instance, by giving additional educational activities.
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Potential Difficulties
The technologist should start by partnering with Mrs. Smith to identify potential security threats to the medicament’s adherence. Teachers on this team could help students overcome these barriers, maybe with a reminder app installation or financial assistance connection. Moreover, the team may need to find an expert in this area to help Mrs. Smith with her depression and anxiety and offer additional support and sources for the issues the woman is dealing with.(Rezaei et al., 2019).
Another challenge might be guaranteeing that all healthcare team employees were involved in the entire quality improvement project. The team would, among other things, have regular meetings to discuss this issue and review progress and problems that crop up along the way. Moreover, the team may continually offer practical skills and education on implementing quality improvement and establishing established outcomes. (Mostafavi et al., 2021).
Evidence Supporting QI Method
For instance, the PDCA cycle has many testimonials of my methods working. This ensures the accuracy of medication lists and error-free medication prescriptions. The third study was by Ayele et al. (2019), where patient education on medication management demonstrated that medication adherence improved glycemic level control and overall quality of life. This result shows patients’ education on managing chronic health problems like diabetes.
Areas of Uncertainty
Type 2 diabetes treatment for human beings is still fraught with different levels of information sufficiency and mysteries. For instance, medication reconciliation is crucial for avoiding medication errors or improving patient results; the challenge may arise about the best possible method of implementing such a process in a unique setting or particular group(patient) population. Also, continuous improvement is needed in teaching patients to take their medication correctly, and this whole process needs to involve patients and their needs and preferences.
There are also some places where more details are needed in this analysis, including how socio-cultural factors affect diabetes management and using a specific communication strategy to ensure patient’s medication regimen compliance. Much more must be done regarding the existing knowledge gaps so the research can continue involving collaboration and interdisciplinary levels of healthcare teams (Warter & Warter, 2019).
An aspect of Type 2 diabetes treatment that has remained unreliable is how often and why patient follow-up visits ought to be made. However, there is a need for additional research on careful monitoring and managing blood sugar so that patients can have better results and reduce healthcare costs (Mian et al., 2019).
NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Change Strategies for the QI Method
The quality improvement project is aimed at enhancing the care and management of type 2 diabetes, targeting the general population and its major complications, including renal failure, with the use of verified and practical change approaches. These interventions are effective because they yield better results for patients and strengthen health systems. The Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle, a systemic approach to implementing healthcare delivery processes and their evaluation, is given in (Jadoon et al., 2012).
Furthermore, interprofessional work creates conditions for the collective problem-solving, communication, and decision-making needed for excellence in quality care improvement. In practice, evidence-based techniques that cover, for instance, medication reconciliation and patient education can impact patients’ outcomes positively and make patients’ experiences more enjoyable (Siaw & Lee, 2019).
Potential Challenges
One possible challenge is the reluctance of healthcare providers or patients to change. To cope with this challenge, the team animates communication and education activities, including explaining to project participants the rationale of the proposed changes and the patient outcomes (Ackermann & O’Brien, 2020).
The second problem concerns the lessened availability of the organizational resources and finances that can be devoted to the new adjusters and construction parameters. Then, the project team, in collaboration with the health leaders, carries out an assessment, coordinates and allocates the necessary resources, and also develops an implementing strategy for future changes and sustainability processes (Bekele et al., 2020). NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster: The team members would eventually increase the project’s feasibility and result in the success of providing better diabetic care with direct actions by identifying and overcoming potential problems before they occur.
Interdisciplinary Teamwork Benefits
The flow of Mrs. Smith’s quality improvement project could be improved via teamwork by providers from across the disciplinary spectrum. This is so because multiple methods of cooperation apply to this type of project team engagement. Thus, such a team can achieve more successful and effective outcomes. The interdisciplinary teamwork process ensures that all areas of health care(c), including the physical, emotional, and social aspects, are addressed by an effective team system. The consortium of doctors and allied professionals is well suited to facing the problems, and over time, with their help, Mrs. Smith would be able to manage her diabetes better. We set up a time to get together and assemble a customized care plan that will detail her wishes and expectations. We can also discuss what she likes and does not like about her treatment regimen.
Through teamwork, we can distribute the work to different parts of the entire patient care circuit. Ultimately, we can ensure the effectiveness of care delivery as all parts work well together (Baines et al., 2019). Interdisciplinary teams can help overcome the significant challenge and uplift the quality of care by making people feel more a part of their healthcare plan, happier, and more adherent to the treatment they have been prescribed.
Identifying Assumptions
Therefore, this study assumes that teamwork across professional disciplines should not be spared for Mrs. Smith’s quality improvement endeavors in diabetes management alongside the comorbidities. It implies that both specialists and generalists from different medical specialties have, disregarding their remits, to work together to provide well-coordinated, full-cycle care, thus leading to more excellent patient outcomes and continued development of the healthcare system.
The investigation also considers regular evaluation and feedback necessary for quality enhancement. By executing interventions to deliver better care to the patient and obtaining feedback from all healthcare teams, the team can identify areas of improvement and make any necessary adjustments to ensure that Mrs. Smith will receive the best care she deserves.
It proposed that medication reconciliation and training patients on medication management are equally robust keys for better disease control and overall health welfare (Bain et al., 2019).
Overall Project Benefits
Implementing quality enhancement strategies, such as standardized medication reconciliation and patient education about medication management, can sometimes achieve quality enhancements, improving patients’ welfare and overall health conditions.
Performing quality improvement practices allows practitioners to see gaps, which can serve as areas for improvement. This can make healthcare a very affordable system by reducing healthcare services’ costs. Collaboration and joint work among members of various branches of healthcare may be possible if the providers are working toward achieving the same goals. NURS FPX 6021 Assessment 3: Quality Improvement Presentation Poster: That will make careers in healthcare hospitals more attractive and avert job dissatisfaction and burnout among healthcare providers (Siaw & Lee, 2019).
Conclusion
Healthcare professionals stand to make a significant contribution to the health of their communities as they work toward improving patients’ outcomes through quality improvement. The PDCA circle (Plan-Do-Check-Act) presents a system framework structured to identify potential improvement chances. Not only is interdisciplinary teamwork dotting the line, but it is also significant for correctly applying quality improvement projects bringing diversity of healthcare providers into one platform to improve patient care experiences. Accepting or making assumptions regarding the effectiveness of medical intervention will allow healthcare professionals to develop and implement appropriate quality improvement measures that lead to improved patient outcomes, ultimately enhancing and increasing the quality of care rendered to patients like Mrs. Smith.
References
Ackermann, R. T., & O’Brien, M. J. (2020). Evidence and challenges for translation and population impact of the diabetes prevention program. Current Diabetes Reports, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-020-1293-4
Ayele, A. A., Tegegn, H. G., Ayele, T. A., & Ayalew, M. B. (2019). Medication regimen complexity and its impact on medication adherence and glycemic control among patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in an Ethiopian general hospital. BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care, 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000685
Bain, S., Cummings, M. H., & McKay, G. A. (2019). Multidisciplinary approach to management and care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. EMJ Diabetes, pp. 73–81. https://doi.org/10.33590/emjdiabet/10314374
Bekele, H., Asefa, A., Getachew, B., & Belete, A. M. (2020). Barriers and strategies to lifestyle and dietary pattern interventions for preventing and managing type-2 diabetes in Africa, systematic review. Journal of Diabetes Research, 2020, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7948712
Burgess, L. H., Kramer, J., Castelein, C., Parra, J. M., Timmons, V., Pickens, S., Fraker, S., & Skinner, C. C. (2021). A pharmacy-led medication reconciliation program reduces adverse drug events and improves satisfaction in a community hospital. HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1295
Chojnacka-Komorowska, A., & Kochaniec, S. (2019). Improving the quality control process using the PDCA cycle. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego We Wrocławiu, 63(4), 69–80. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.4.06
Galletta, M., Piazza, M. F., Meloni, S. L., Chessa, E., Piras, I., Arnetz, J. E., & D’Aloja, E. (2022). Patient Involvement in Shared Decision-Making: Do Patients Rate Physicians and Nurses Differently? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14229. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114229
Jadoon, N. A., Noor, S., Iqbal, M., & Pervez, N. (2021). Improving glycemic control in patients with COVID-19: A quality improvement project. Metabolism, 116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154488
Magny-Normilus, C., Nolido, N. V., Borges, J. C., Brady, M., Labonville, S., Williams, D., Soukup, J., Lipsitz, S., Hudson, M., & Schnipper, J. L. (2019). Effects of an intensive discharge intervention on medication adherence, glycemic control, and readmission rates in patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000601
Mian, Z., Hermayer, K. L., & Jenkins, A. (2019). Continuous glucose monitoring: Review of an innovation in diabetes management. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 358(5), 332–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2019.07.003
Mostafavi, F., Alavijeh, F. Z., Salahshouri, A., & Mahaki, B. (2021). The psychosocial barriers to medication adherence of patients with type 2 diabetes: A qualitative study. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13030-020-00202-x
Rezaei, M., Valiee, S., Tahan, M., Ebtekar, F., & Ghanei Gheshlagh, R. (2019). Barriers of medication adherence in patients with type-2 diabetes: A pilot qualitative study. Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, Volume 12, 589–599. https://doi.org/10.2147/dmso.s197159
Siaw, M. Y. L., & Lee, J. Y.-C. (2019). Multidisciplinary collaborative care in managing patients with uncontrolled diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 73(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.13288
Warter, L., & Warter, I. (2019). Cultural competency and diabetes. Challenges for physician-patient communication. Journal of Intercultural Management and Ethics, 2(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.35478/jime.2019.1.09
Explore our other nursing samples for further assistance and resources.